1874ef935c
clustering is obsolescent technology so hardly anyone noticed. On a DORS 32160 SCSI drive with 4 tags, read clustering makes very little difference even for huge sequential reads. However, on a ZIP SCSI drive with 0 tags, the minimum overhead per block is about 40 msec, so very large clusters must be used to get anywhere near the maximum transfer rate. Using clusters consisting of 1 8K block reduces the transfer rate to about 250K/sec. Under msdosfs, missing read clustering is normal and a cluster size of 1 512 byte block reduces the transfer rate to about 25K/sec. Broken in: rev.1.18 |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
COPYRIGHT.INFO | ||
ext2_alloc.c | ||
ext2_balloc.c | ||
ext2_bmap.c | ||
ext2_extern.h | ||
ext2_fs_sb.h | ||
ext2_fs.h | ||
ext2_inode_cnv.c | ||
ext2_inode.c | ||
ext2_linux_balloc.c | ||
ext2_linux_ialloc.c | ||
ext2_lookup.c | ||
ext2_mount.h | ||
ext2_readwrite.c | ||
ext2_subr.c | ||
ext2_vfsops.c | ||
ext2_vnops.c | ||
fs.h | ||
i386-bitops.h | ||
inode.h |