being held before sleeping.
This has bitten me (in ath(4)) once before and I'd like to see this
not bite anyone else.
Differential Revision: D1638
Reviewed by: jhb, hselasky
MFC after: 1 week
1 second is not enugh for TDA19988 HDMI framer (e.g. on Beaglebone Black)
- Add per-device i2c_timout sysctl (dev.iichb.X.i2c_timeout) to control
I2C bus timeout manually
- Pass softc instead of device_t to all sysctl handlers
anything until the interface is assigned an address. This fixes
ipfw_nat to do the same by using an IP of INADDR_ANY instead of
aborting the nat setup if the requested interface is not yet configured.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1539
Reviewed by: melifaro, glebius, gnn
MFC after: 1 week
each GB of RAM tested so people watching the console can see that
the machine is making progress and not hung.
PR: 196650
Submitted by: Ravi Pokala <rpokala@panasas.com>
Suggestions from: Eric van Gyzen <eric@vangyzen.net>
MFC after: 2 weeks
was longer than the second's. There is no need to compute and compare the
member list lengths in a separate pass, since we now just return false when
comparing member names if the list lengths are not equal.
MFC after: 2 weeks
GDB: Replace use of sprintf.
2005-03-17 Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>
* corelow.c (get_core_register_section): Replace usage of sprintf
and strcpy with xstrprintf and xstrdup.
Sourceware commit: 3ecda4574edb38ad12fb491ccaf6d9b0caa3a07a
CID: 1006819
MFC after: 4 days
2005-03-17 Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>
* corelow.c (get_core_register_section): Replace usage of sprintf
and strcpy with xstrprintf and xstrdup.
Sourceware commit: 3ecda4574edb38ad12fb491ccaf6d9b0caa3a07a
2004-05-21 Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
* dwarf2expr.c (execute_stack_op): Add 'break' statements after
cases for DW_OP_div and DW_OP_shr. (Thanks to Reva Cuthbertson.)
Sourceware commit 99c87dab95747d380392a3698740507a21ad3236
kill a process, when the system runs out of memory. Defaults to off.
Usually, this is most useful when the OOM condition is due to mismanagement
of memory, on a system where the applications in question don't respond well
to being killed.
In theory, if the system is properly managed, it shouldn't be possible to
hit this condition. If it does, the panic can be more desirable for some
users (since it can be a good means of finding the root cause) rather than
killing the largest process and continuing on its merry way.
As kib@ mentions in the differential, there is also protect(1), which uses
procctl(PROC_SPROTECT) to ensure that some processes are immune. However,
a panic approach is still useful in some environments. This is primarily
intended as a development/debugging tool.
Differential Revision: D1627
Reviewed by: kib
MFC after: 1 week
