Just like /dev/devctl, /dev/fuse will now report the number of operations
available for immediate read in the kevent.data field during kevent(2).
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
/dev/fuse was already pollable with poll and select. Add support for
kqueue, too. And add tests for polling with poll, select, and kqueue.
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
* In the fatal_signal test, wait for the daemon to receive FUSE_INTERRUPT
before exiting.
* Explicitly disable restarting syscalls after SIGUSR2. This fixes
intermittency in the priority test. I don't know why, but sometimes that
test's mkdir would be restarted, and sometimes it would return EINTR.
ERESTART should be the default.
* Remove a useless copy/pasted sleep in the priority test.
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
If the daemon dies, return ENOTCONN for all operations that have already
been sent to the daemon, as well as any new ones.
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
If the daemon is known to ignore FUSE_INTERRUPT, then we may as well block
all signals while waiting for a response.
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
When a FUSE daemon dies or closes /dev/fuse, all of that daemon's pending
requests must be terminated. Previously that was done in /dev/fuse's
.d_close method. However, d_close only gets called on the *last* close of
the device. That means that if multiple daemons were running concurrently,
all but the last daemon to close would leave their I/O hanging around. The
problem was easily visible just by running "kyua -v parallelism=2 test" in
fusefs's test directory.
Fix this bug by terminating a daemon's pending I/O during /dev/fuse's
cdvpriv dtor method instead. That method runs on every close of a file.
Also, fix some potential races in the tests:
* Clear SA_RESTART when registering the daemon's signal handler so read(2)
will return EINTR.
* Wait for the daemon to die before unmounting the mountpoint, so we won't
see an unwanted FUSE_DESTROY operation in the mock file system.
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Some fusefs tests must sleep because they deliberately trigger a race, or
because they're testing the cache timeout functionality. Consolidate the
sleep interval in a single place so it will be easy to adjust. Shorten it
from either 500ms or 250ms to 100ms. From experiment I find that 10ms works
every time, so 100ms should be fairly safe.
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Replace some sleeps with semaphore operations. Not all sleeps can be
replaced, though. Some are trying to lose a race.
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
libfuse expects sockets to be created with FUSE_MKNOD, not FUSE_CREATE,
because that's how Linux does it. My first attempt at creating sockets
(r346894) used FUSE_CREATE because FreeBSD uses VOP_CREATE for this purpose.
There are no backwards-compatibility concerns with this change, because
socket support hasn't yet been merged to head.
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Any change to a directory's contents should cause its mtime and ctime to be
updated by the FUSE daemon. Clear its attribute cache so we'll get the new
attributs the next time that they're needed. This affects the following
VOPs: VOP_CREATE, VOP_LINK, VOP_MKDIR, VOP_MKNOD, VOP_REMOVE, VOP_RMDIR, and
VOP_SYMLINK
Reported by: pjdfstest
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
If the file to be renamed is a directory and it's going to get a new parent,
then the user must have write permissions to that directory, because the
".." dirent must be changed.
Reported by: pjdfstest
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
FUSE_LINK returns a new set of attributes. fusefs should cache them just
like it does during other VOPs. This is not only a matter of performance
but of correctness too; without caching the new attributes the vnode's nlink
value would be out-of-date.
Reported by: pjdfstest
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Even an unprivileged user should be able to chown a file to its current
owner, or chgrp it to its current group. Those are no-ops.
Reported by: pjdfstest
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
fuse file systems have far too much variability for the standard
posix_fallocate implementation to work. A future protocol revision (7.19)
adds a FUSE_FALLOCATE operation, but we don't support that yet. Better to
simply return EINVAL until then.
Reported by: pjdfstest
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
ftruncate should succeed as long as the file descriptor is writable, even if
the file doesn't have write permission. This is important when combined
with O_CREAT.
Reported by: pjdfstest
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Don't allow unprivileged users to set SGID on files to whose group they
don't belong. This is slightly different than what POSIX says we should do
(clear sgid on return from a successful chmod), but it matches what UFS
currently does.
Reported by: pjdfstest
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
The readonly mount check had a special case allowing the sizes of files to
be changed if they weren't regular files. I don't know why. Neither UFS,
ZFS, nor ext2 have such a special case, and I don't know when you would ever
change the size of a non-regular file anyway.
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
These panics all lie in the error path. The only one I've hit is caused by
a buggy FUSE server unexpectedly changing the type of a vnode.
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
When mounted with -o default_permissions fusefs is supposed to validate all
permissions in the kernel, not the file system. This commit fixes two
permissions that I had previously overlooked.
* Only root may chown a file
* Non-root users may only chgrp a file to a group to which they belong
PR: 216391
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
This test had been disabled because it was designed to check protocol
7.9-specific functionality. Enable it without the 7.9-specific bit.
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
As of r346162 fuse now invalidates the cache during writes. But it can't do
that when writing from VOP_PUTPAGES, because the write is coming _from_ the
cache. Trying to invalidate the cache in that situation causes a deadlock
in vm_object_page_remove, because the pages in question have already been
busied by the same thread.
PR: 235774
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
An off-by-one error led to the last page of a write not being removed from
its object, even though that page's buffer was marked as invalid.
PR: 235774
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Though it's not documented, Linux will interpret a FUSE_INTERRUPT response
of ENOSYS as "the file system does not support FUSE_INTERRUPT".
Subsequently it will never send FUSE_INTERRUPT again to the same mount
point. This change matches Linux's behavior.
PR: 346357
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
* Block stop signals in fticket_wait_answer
* Hold ps_mtx while checking signal disposition
* style(9) changes
PR: 346357
Reported by: kib
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
The main difference is to replace some custom logic with bread. No
functional change at this point, but this is one step towards adding
readahead.
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
r346162 factored out v_inval_buf_range from vtruncbuf, but it made an error
in the interface between the two. The result was a failure to remove
buffers past the first. Surprisingly, I couldn't reproduce the failure with
file systems other than fuse.
Also, modify fusefs's truncate_discards_cached_data test to catch this bug.
PR: 346162
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
When interrupting a FUSE operation, send the FUSE_INTERRUPT op to the daemon
ASAP, ahead of other unrelated operations.
PR: 236530
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
fusefs's VOP_SETEXTATTR calls uiomove(9) before blocking, so it can't be
restarted. It must be interrupted instead.
PR: 236530
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
If a pending FUSE operation hasn't yet been sent to the daemon, then there's
no reason to inform the daemon that it's been interrupted. Instead, simply
remove it from the fuse message queue and set its status to EINTR or
ERESTART as appropriate.
PR: 346357
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
* If a process receives a fatal signal while blocked on a fuse operation,
return ASAP without waiting for the operation to complete. But still send
the FUSE_INTERRUPT op to the daemon.
* Plug memory leaks from r346339
Interruptibility is now fully functional, but it could be better:
* Operations that haven't been sent to the server yet should be aborted
without sending FUSE_INTERRUPT.
* It would be great if write operations could be made restartable.
That would require delaying uiomove until the last possible moment, which
would be sometime during fuse_device_read.
* It would be nice if we didn't have to guess which EAGAIN responses were
for FUSE_INTERRUPT operations.
PR: 236530
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
The fuse protocol includes a FUSE_INTERRUPT operation that the client can
send to the server to indicate that it wants to abort an in-progress
operation. It's required to interrupt any syscall that is blocking on a
fuse operation.
This commit adds basic FUSE_INTERRUPT support. If a process receives any
signal while it's blocking on a FUSE operation, it will send a
FUSE_INTERRUPT and wait for the original operation to complete. But there
is still much to do:
* The current code will leak memory if the server ignores FUSE_INTERRUPT,
which many do. It will also leak memory if the server completes the
original operation before it receives the FUSE_INTERRUPT.
* An interrupted read(2) will incorrectly appear to be successful.
* fusefs should return immediately for fatal signals.
* Operations that haven't been sent to the server yet should be aborted
without sending FUSE_INTERRUPT.
* Test coverage should be better.
* It would be great if write operations could be made restartable.
That would require delaying uiomove until the last possible moment, which
would be sometime during fuse_device_read.
PR: 236530
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
