. Print the column headers centered (except for the left-aligned
TYPE header) using a different header for architectures where
sizeof(uintptr_t) is not four.
. Consistently do not print a '0x' prefix for hexadecimal values.
. Separate columns by a single space character.
. Pad the columns presenting an address or offset enough to hold
their respective largest value.
. Do not restrict the output to unknown file types, inodes and
sockets; allow displaying of pipes, fifos, kqueues and crypto file
descriptors too.
- Shorten an overly long line by removing a cast of printf's return
value to void.
PR: alpha/45240
Tested on: i386, sparc64, alpha
if allowed by their filesystem permissions.
This doesn't break anything since using sendfile(2)
is triggered later by a separate S_ISREG conditional.
PR: bin/20824
MFC after: 1 week
- The PAM kbdint device sometimes doesn't know authentication succeeded
until you re-query it. The ssh1 kbdint code would never re-query the
device, so authentication would always fail. This patch has been
submitted to the OpenSSH developers.
- The monitor code for PAM sometimes forgot to tell the monitor that
authentication had succeeded. This caused the monitor to veto the
privsep child's decision to allow the connection.
These patches have been tested with OpenSSH clients on -STABLE, NetBSD and
Linux, and with ssh.com's ssh1 on Solaris.
Sponsored by: DARPA, NAI Labs
under load.
This patch has been tested by Thomas and other for more than a month now,
and all (known) hangs seem to be solved.
Thomas's explanation of the patch:
* Fix the problem with the printing of the RX-error.
* Code from if_fet do better deal with the RX-recovery including a
timeout of the RX-turnoff.
* The call to vr_rxeof before vr_rxeoc have been moved to a point
where the RX-part of the chip is turned off. Otherwise there is a
window where new data could have been written to the buffer chain
before the RX-part is turned off. If this happens the chip will see
a busy rx-buffer. I have no evidence that this have occured but
god knows what the chip will do in this case!
* I have added a timeout of the TX-turnoff. I have checked and in
my 900 MHz system the flags for turnoff (both RX & TX) is seen at
the first check in the loop.
* I could see that I got the VR_ISR_DROPPED interrupt sometimes and
started to thinking about this. I then realized that no recovery is
needed for this case and therefore I only count it as an rxerror
(which was not done before).
* Finally I have changed the FIFO RX threshhold to 128 bytes. When I
did this the VR_ISR_DROPPED interrupt went away. Theory: The chip
will receive a complete frame before it tries to write it out to
memory then the RX threshold is set to store'n'forward. IF the frame
is large AND the next rx frame also is large AND the bus is busy
transfering a TX frame to the TX fifo THEN the second received
frame wont fit in the FIFO and is then dropped. By having the RX
threshold set to 128 the RX fifo is emptied faster.
MFC after: 5 days
Make passing the methods in a cdevsw structure optional.
Move "CANFREE" and "NOGIANT" flags into struct disk instead of the
cdevsw which may or may not be there.
Rename CANFREE to CANDELETE to match BIO_DELETE operation.
Add "OPEN" flag so drivers don't have to provide open/close methods
just to maintain such a flag.
Add temporary stopgap include of <sys/conf.h> to <sys/disk.h> until
the files which have them in the other order are fixed.
Add KASSERTS to make sure we don't get fed too many NULL pointers.
Clear our geom's softc pointer before we wither.
between any pair of values in range 4-96kHz. Thanks to Ken Marks for
discovering there were problems with the previous version.
o Use a non-recursive gcd routine.
interface was left in an active, but not connected, state, which resulted
in data being sent to it and the transmit queue filling up. This happened
because the driver never informed sppp that it shoulkd clean up the
connection. This fix informs sppp that it should clean things up.
The fix was actually developed and tested under -stable, so a short MFC
period seems appropriate, say 2 days.
Contributed by: Ari Suutari <ari.suutari@syncrontech.com>
