At least one AR5416 user has reported measurable throughput drops
with this option. For now, disable it and make it a run-time
twiddle. It won't take affect until the next radio programming
trip though (eg channel scan, channel change.)
so there's no need to enable the RX of invalid frames just to do ANI.
The if_ath code and AR5212 ANI code setup the RX filter bits to enable
receiving OFDM/CCK errors if the device doesn't have the hardware
MIB counters. It isn't initialising it for the AR5416+ because all of
those chips have hardware MIB counters.
This fixes the odd (and performance affecting!) situation where if ani
is enabled (via sysctl dev.ath.X.intmit) then suddenly there's be a very
large volume of phy errors - which is good to track, but not what was
intended. Since each PHY error is a received (0 length) frame, it can
significantly tie up the RX side of things.
It's still not ready for prime-time - there's some TX niggles with these 11n
cards that I'm still trying to wrap my head around, and AMPDU-TX is just not
implemented so things will come to a crashing halt if you're not careful.
This fix modifies the const addac initval array, rather than modifying
a local copy. It means that running >1 AR9160 on a board may prove to
be unpredictable.
The AR5416 init path also does something similar, so supporting
>1 AR5416 of different revisions could cause problems.
The later fix will be to create a private copy of the Addac data
for the AR5416, AR9160 (and AR9100 when it's merged in) and then
modify that as needed.
Obtained From: Linux ath9k
I found this when trying to figure out why the RX PHY error count
didn't match the OFDM error count ANI was using. It turns out
there was two problems:
* What this commit addresses - using the wrong mask for OFDM errors,
and
* The RX filter is set incorrectly after a channel scan (at least)
even if interference mitigation is enabled by default.
ANI is still disabled by default for the AR5416 and later chips.
bring it in line with the rest of the register initialisation.
I've verified that the 2/5ghz board values written to the
chip match what was previously written.
* add pspoll/uapsd queue setup defaults;
* enable the exponential backoff window rather than the random
backoff window when doing TX contention management.
would be a problem, make sure it isn't overwritten by whatever is in
there at cold reset.
This brings the > ar5416 init path treatment of AR_MISC_MODE.
* Pull out the static rix stuff into a different function
* I know this may slightly drop performance, but check if a static
rix is needed before each packet TX.
* Whilst I'm at it, add a little extra debugging to the rate
control stuff to make it easier to follow what's going on.
Give it a good go (32 attempts) and then print out a warning that's
going to occur whether HAL debugging is enabled or not. Then don't
abort the radio setup; just continue merrily along.
This should fix the issue that users were having where scanning would
occasionally fail on the active channel, causing traffic to cease
until the radio scanned again.
not needed.
These calibrations are only applicable if the chip operating mode
engages both interleaved RX ADCs (ie, it's compensating for the
differences in DC gain and DC offset -between- the two ADCs.)
Otherwise the chip reads values of 0x0 for the secondary ADC
(as I guess it's not enabled here) and thus writes potentially
bogus info into the chip.
I've tested this on the AR9160 and AR9280; both behave themselves
in 11g mode with these calibrations disabled.
for fixing them based on the ath9k related TXQ fixes.
I've done this so people can go over the history of the diffs to the original
AR5212 routines (which AR5416 and later chips use) to see what's changed.
This commit really is "fix the OFDM duration calculation to match reality when
running in 802.11g mode."
The AR5212 init vals set AR_MISC_MODE to 0x0 and all the bits that can be set are
set through code.
The AR5416 and later initvals set AR_MISC_MODE to various other values (with
the AR5212 AR_MISC_MODE options cleared), which include AR_PCU_CCK_SIFS_MODE .
This adds 6uS to SIFS on non-CCK frames when transmitting.
This fixes the issue where _DATA_ 802.11g OFDM frames were being TX'ed with
the ACK duration set to 38uS, not 44uS as on the AR5212 (and other devices.)
The AR5212 TX pathway obeys the software-programmed duration field in the packet,
but the 11n TX pathway overrides that with a hardware-calculated duration. This
was getting it wrong because of the above AR_MISC_MODE setting. I've verified
that 11g data OFDM frames are now being TXed with the correct ACK+SIFS duration
programmed in.
Since ath9k does some slightly different bit fiddling when setting up
the TX queues, it may that the TX queue setup/reset functions will need
overriding later on.
This does a few things in particular:
* Abstracts out the gain control settings into a separate function;
* Configure antenna diversity, LNA and antenna gain parameters;
* Configure ob/db entries - the later v4k EEPROM modal revisions have
multiple OB/DB parameters which are used for some form of
calibration. Although the radio does have defaults for each,
the EEPROM can override them.
This resolves the AR2427 related issues I've been seeing and makes
it stable at all 11g rates for both TX and RX.
The offsets didn't match the assumption that nfarray[] is ordered by the
chainmask bits and programmed via the register order in ar5416_cca_regs[].
This repairs that damage and ensures that chain 1 is programmed correctly.
(And extension channels will now be programmed correctly also.)
This fixes some of the stuck beacons I've been seeing on my AR9160/AR5416
setups - because Chain 1 would be programmed -80 or -85 dBm, which is
higher than the actual noise floor and thus convincing the radio that
indeed it can't ever transmit.
rather than duplicating them for the v14 (ar5416+) and v4k (ar9285) codebases.
Further chipsets (eg the AR9287) have yet another EEPROM format which will use
these routines to calculate things.
to the TX closed-loop power control registers.
* Modify a couple of functions to take the register chain number,
rather than the regChainOffset value. This allows for the
register chain to be logged.
Linux ath9k.
The ath9k ar9002_hw_init_cal() isn't entirely clear about what
is supposed to be called for what chipsets, so I'm ignoring the
rest of it and just porting the AR9285 init cal path as-is and
leaving the rest alone. Subsequent commits may also tidy up the
Merlin (AR9285) and other chipset support.
Obtained from: Linux ath9k
The ath9k driver has a unified boundary/pdadc function, whereas
ours is split into two (one for each EEPROM type.) This is why
the AR9280 check is done here where we could safely assume it'll
always be AR9280 or later.
this is incorrect for Kite (AR9285) and any future chipsets that
override the EEPROM related routines.
It meant that a direct call to set the TX power would call the v14 EEPROM
AR5416/AR9280 calibration routines, rather than the v4k EEPROM routines
for the AR9285. It thus read the incorrect values from the EEPROM and
programmed garbage PDADC and TX power values into the hardware.
It looks like these apply in both open and closed loop TX power control,
but the only merlin boards i have either have OL -or- a non-default power
offset, not both.
to both make things clearer, and to make it easier to write userland
code which pulls in these definitions without needing to pull in the
rest of the HAL.
This stuff should be deprecated at some point in the future once
the net80211 regulatory domain support encapsulates all of the
defintions here.
This is something bus clock related from what I can gather. It is needed for
the AR9220 based Ubiquiti SR71-12 and SR71-15 Mini-PCI NICs.
(Note: those NICs don't work right now because of earlier changes to handle
power table offset correctly. That'll be resolved in a follow-up commit.)
Merlin (ar9280) and later were full-reset if they're doing open-loop TX
power control but the TSF wasn't being saved/restored.
Add ar5212SetTsf64() which sets the 64 bit TSF appropriately.
generally tidy up the TX power programming code.
Enforce that the TX power offset for Merlin is -5 dBm, rather than
any other value programmable in the EEPROM. This requires some
further code to be ported over from ath9k, so until that is done
and tested, fail to attach NICs whose TX power offset isn't -5
dBm.
This improves both legacy and HT transmission on my merlin board.
It allows for stable MCS TX up to MCS15.
Specifics:
* Refactor out a bunch of the TX power calibration code -
setting/obtaining the power detector / gain boundaries,
programming the PDADC
* Take the -5 dBm TX power offset into account on Merlin -
"0" in the per-rate TX power register means -5 dBm, not
0 dBm
* When doing OLC
* Enforce min (0) and max (AR5416_MAX_RATE_POWER) when fiddling
with the TX power, to avoid the TX power values from wrapping
when low.
* Implement the 1 dBm cck power offset when doing OLC
* Implement temperature compensation for 2.4ghz mode when doing OLC
* Implement an AR9280 specific TX power calibration routine which
includes the OLC twiddles, leaving the earlier chipset path
(AR5416, AR9160) alone
Whilst here, use these refactored routines for the AR9285 TX power
calibration/programming code and enforce correct overflow/underflow
handling when fiddling with TX power values.
Obtained from: linux ath9k
It defaults to -5 dBm for eeproms earlier than v21.
This apparently only applies to Merlin (AR9280) or later,
earlier 11n chipsets have a power table offset of 0.
All the code in ath9k which checks the power table offset
and takes it into account first ensures the chip is
Merlin or later.
The earlier way of doing debugging would evaluate the function parameters
before calling the HALDEBUG. In the case of detailed register debugging
would mean a -lot- of unneeded register IO and other stuff was going on.
This method evaluates the ath_hal_debug variable before the function
parameters are evaluated, drastically reducing the amount of overhead
enabling HAL debugging during compilation.
determining whether to use MRR or not.
It uses the 11g protection mode when calculating 11n related stuff, rather
than checking the 11n protection mode.
Furthermore, the 11n chipsets can quite happily handle multi-rate retry w/
protection; the TX path and rate control modules need to be taught about
that.
