Merge commit 41449c58c from llvm git (by Roger Ferrer Ibanez):
[RISCV] Fix evaluation of %pcrel_lo The following testcase function: .Lpcrel_label1: auipc a0, %pcrel_hi(other_function) addi a1, a0, %pcrel_lo(.Lpcrel_label1) .p2align 2 # Causes a new fragment to be emitted .type other_function,@function other_function: ret exposes an odd behaviour in which only the %pcrel_hi relocation is evaluated but not the %pcrel_lo. $ llvm-mc -triple riscv64 -filetype obj t.s | llvm-objdump -d -r - <stdin>: file format ELF64-riscv Disassembly of section .text: 0000000000000000 function: 0: 17 05 00 00 auipc a0, 0 4: 93 05 05 00 mv a1, a0 0000000000000004: R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_I other_function+4 0000000000000008 other_function: 8: 67 80 00 00 ret The reason seems to be that in RISCVAsmBackend::shouldForceRelocation we only consider the fragment but in RISCVMCExpr::evaluatePCRelLo we consider the section. This usually works but there are cases where the section may still be the same but the fragment may be another one. In that case we end forcing a %pcrel_lo relocation without any %pcrel_hi. This patch makes RISCVAsmBackend::shouldForceRelocation use the section, if any, to determine if the relocation must be forced or not. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60657 This is a prerequisite for building and linking hard- and soft-float riscv worlds with clang and lld. Requested by: jhb MFC after: 1 week X-MFC-With: r353358
This commit is contained in:
parent
f65136d23a
commit
8f6d9a8e68
@ -64,11 +64,15 @@ bool RISCVAsmBackend::shouldForceRelocation(const MCAssembler &Asm,
|
||||
case RISCV::fixup_riscv_tls_gd_hi20:
|
||||
ShouldForce = true;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case RISCV::fixup_riscv_pcrel_hi20:
|
||||
ShouldForce = T->getValue()->findAssociatedFragment() !=
|
||||
Fixup.getValue()->findAssociatedFragment();
|
||||
case RISCV::fixup_riscv_pcrel_hi20: {
|
||||
MCFragment *TFragment = T->getValue()->findAssociatedFragment();
|
||||
MCFragment *FixupFragment = Fixup.getValue()->findAssociatedFragment();
|
||||
assert(FixupFragment && "We should have a fragment for this fixup");
|
||||
ShouldForce =
|
||||
!TFragment || TFragment->getParent() != FixupFragment->getParent();
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user