An EXAMPLE section was adding with some basic examples that show the use of
uniq(1) with various flags.
Submitted by: fernape@
Approved by: bcr@
MFC after: 4 days
Relnotes: yes (EXAMPLE section for uniq(1))
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25149
This adds a new -D/--all-repeats option to uniq(1), which outputs each copy
of any repeated lines (as opposed to a single copy of a repeated line). You
can specify a separator option to output a blank line before or after each
group of repeated lines. This adds compatibility with the GNU coreutils
version of uniq(1).
This change also re-groups the -c, -d, -D, -u options in the usage display
and man page to indicate that they are mutally exclusive of each other. This
matches the posix/opengroup definition of uniq(1) command line args. Note
that this change does NOT actually enforce the mutual exclusion in the code,
for now, it simply documents that the arguments should be considered
exclusive with each other.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D22262
Mainly focus on files that use BSD 3-Clause license.
The Software Package Data Exchange (SPDX) group provides a specification
to make it easier for automated tools to detect and summarize well known
opensource licenses. We are gradually adopting the specification, noting
that the tags are considered only advisory and do not, in any way,
superceed or replace the license texts.
Special thanks to Wind River for providing access to "The Duke of
Highlander" tool: an older (2014) run over FreeBSD tree was useful as a
starting point.
Bring in some bits from NetBSD and lift the restriction in uniq(1) that
-c cannot be used with the -d and -u options. This restriction seems
unnecessary and is supported at least by GNU, OpenBSD, and NetBSD. Lift
the restriction and simplify the show() logic a little bit to maintain
functionality when -c is provided with -d/-u.
Also with this change, -d and -u are now actually a mutually exclusive,
albeit valid, combination. Given that they both indicate opposite
behavior, uniq(1) will no longer output anything if both -d and -u are
supplied. This is in line with NetBSD as well as GNU.
Adjust the man page and usage() to reflect that -c is its own standalone
option.
PR: 200553
Submitted by: Kyle Evans <kevans91@ksu.edu>
Reviewed by: cem, emaste
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D10694
Renumber cluase 4 to 3, per what everybody else did when BSD granted
them permission to remove clause 3. My insistance on keeping the same
numbering for legal reasons is too pedantic, so give up on that point.
Submitted by: Jan Schaumann <jschauma@stevens.edu>
Pull Request: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/pull/96
Off by default, build behaves normally.
WITH_META_MODE we get auto objdir creation, the ability to
start build from anywhere in the tree.
Still need to add real targets under targets/ to build packages.
Differential Revision: D2796
Reviewed by: brooks imp
in the future in a backward compatible (API and ABI) way.
The cap_rights_t represents capability rights. We used to use one bit to
represent one right, but we are running out of spare bits. Currently the new
structure provides place for 114 rights (so 50 more than the previous
cap_rights_t), but it is possible to grow the structure to hold at least 285
rights, although we can make it even larger if 285 rights won't be enough.
The structure definition looks like this:
struct cap_rights {
uint64_t cr_rights[CAP_RIGHTS_VERSION + 2];
};
The initial CAP_RIGHTS_VERSION is 0.
The top two bits in the first element of the cr_rights[] array contain total
number of elements in the array - 2. This means if those two bits are equal to
0, we have 2 array elements.
The top two bits in all remaining array elements should be 0.
The next five bits in all array elements contain array index. Only one bit is
used and bit position in this five-bits range defines array index. This means
there can be at most five array elements in the future.
To define new right the CAPRIGHT() macro must be used. The macro takes two
arguments - an array index and a bit to set, eg.
#define CAP_PDKILL CAPRIGHT(1, 0x0000000000000800ULL)
We still support aliases that combine few rights, but the rights have to belong
to the same array element, eg:
#define CAP_LOOKUP CAPRIGHT(0, 0x0000000000000400ULL)
#define CAP_FCHMOD CAPRIGHT(0, 0x0000000000002000ULL)
#define CAP_FCHMODAT (CAP_FCHMOD | CAP_LOOKUP)
There is new API to manage the new cap_rights_t structure:
cap_rights_t *cap_rights_init(cap_rights_t *rights, ...);
void cap_rights_set(cap_rights_t *rights, ...);
void cap_rights_clear(cap_rights_t *rights, ...);
bool cap_rights_is_set(const cap_rights_t *rights, ...);
bool cap_rights_is_valid(const cap_rights_t *rights);
void cap_rights_merge(cap_rights_t *dst, const cap_rights_t *src);
void cap_rights_remove(cap_rights_t *dst, const cap_rights_t *src);
bool cap_rights_contains(const cap_rights_t *big, const cap_rights_t *little);
Capability rights to the cap_rights_init(), cap_rights_set(),
cap_rights_clear() and cap_rights_is_set() functions are provided by
separating them with commas, eg:
cap_rights_t rights;
cap_rights_init(&rights, CAP_READ, CAP_WRITE, CAP_FSTAT);
There is no need to terminate the list of rights, as those functions are
actually macros that take care of the termination, eg:
#define cap_rights_set(rights, ...) \
__cap_rights_set((rights), __VA_ARGS__, 0ULL)
void __cap_rights_set(cap_rights_t *rights, ...);
Thanks to using one bit as an array index we can assert in those functions that
there are no two rights belonging to different array elements provided
together. For example this is illegal and will be detected, because CAP_LOOKUP
belongs to element 0 and CAP_PDKILL to element 1:
cap_rights_init(&rights, CAP_LOOKUP | CAP_PDKILL);
Providing several rights that belongs to the same array's element this way is
correct, but is not advised. It should only be used for aliases definition.
This commit also breaks compatibility with some existing Capsicum system calls,
but I see no other way to do that. This should be fine as Capsicum is still
experimental and this change is not going to 9.x.
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
is in accordance with the information provided at
ftp://ftp.cs.berkeley.edu/pub/4bsd/README.Impt.License.Change
Also add $FreeBSD$ to a few files to keep svn happy.
Discussed with: imp, rwatson
in the input data but fallback to "binary equal" check instead.
POSIX says: "The input file shall be a text file", nothing more,
so the text file with illegal sequence is valid input.
BTW, GNU sort does not fails on EILSEQ too.
2) Speedup input processing a bit in complex cases like skipping fields,
chars or ignore case.
3) Enforce the implied LINE_MAX limit (from POSIX definition of "text file"
and POSIX uniq(1) description).
- Prevent overflowing of the buffer length variable in getline() by
limiting its maximum value.
- Exit if reallocf(3) fails in getline(). Failure was silently
considered as end-of-file.
Reviewed by: ghelmer
Approved by: trasz (mentor)
Of particular interest is the fact that LC_COLLATE affects how uniq
determines whether lines are equal. This was the subject of a fairly heated
debate a year or so ago, and it turns out that the current behaviour is
correct and that the standard contained an error.
Now that the standard has been corrected by Cor. 1-2002, refer to 1003.1-2001
instead of the 1992 edition in the Standards section.
Add some constness to avoid some warnings.
Remove use register keyword.
Deal with missing/unneeded extern/prototypes.
Some minor type changes/casts to avoid warnings.
Reviewed by: md5
