Commit Graph

13 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
ru
30b466801f Markup nits. 2006-12-24 19:55:38 +00:00
brueffer
2a75eb6afb - Remove MLINKS to nonexistant manpages
- Change some section numbers to match reality
- For MLINKS to manpages from ports, mention which port installs them

MFC after:	3 days
2005-07-14 20:29:08 +00:00
ru
1541af42f1 Expand *n't contractions. 2005-02-13 22:25:33 +00:00
ru
fb1d8b3724 Mechanically kill hard sentence breaks. 2004-07-02 22:22:35 +00:00
joerg
dea7082ccd Bump the .Dd value.
Update xrefs to more contemporary items.

Requested by:	ru, green
MFC after:	1 week
2004-05-14 19:29:39 +00:00
joerg
af9cca8aed When I wrote this man page more than 5 years ago, I simply didn't
understand the true symmetric nature of Enigma, so my description of
``automatically detects that the input is encrypted'' was simply
wrong.  Replace that by a more accurate description of why feeding the
ciphertext again into the engine will decrypt it.

MFC after:	1 week
2004-05-14 18:46:16 +00:00
charnier
a07fb1cc07 Use `The .Nm utility' 2002-04-19 23:44:58 +00:00
ru
0d1334ca0c mdoc(7) police: use the new features of the Nm macro. 2000-11-20 19:21:22 +00:00
peter
3b842d34e8 $Id$ -> $FreeBSD$ 1999-08-28 01:08:13 +00:00
mpp
678c6e21bd Various man page cleanup:
- Sort xrefs
- Be consistent with section names as outlines in mdoc(7).
- Other misc mdoc cleanup.

PR:		doc/13144
Submitted by:	Alexey M. Zelkin <phantom@cris.net>
1999-08-15 08:25:34 +00:00
mpp
74991d7076 Some man page cleanup. Make the NAME and SYNOPSIS sections agree so
that whatis(1) will produce the expected results.

Pointed-out-by: Jesus Monroy <jesus.monroy@usa.net> in freebsd-doc
1999-06-24 06:22:24 +00:00
billf
71473f4690 Typo.
PR:		docs/9752
Submitted by:	horikawa@jp.FreeBSD.org
1999-01-28 19:22:22 +00:00
joerg
52a3cc418d Fix some of the more blatant bugs in the original code, provide a
BSD-able Makefile, add a man page (that also puts a bold warning about
the weakness of the encryption), and implement the -k option for
compatibility with other vendor's implementations.  (Unlike those
other vendors, we actually also document this option and its
problems.)

There are more violations of style(9) in it, like the not-use of
getopt(3), but it's not worth the while fixing all of this.
1998-10-30 18:24:54 +00:00