same ASIC ID of BCM5758 such that r198318 incorecctly enabled TSO
on BCM5754.BCM5754M controllers. BCM5754/BCM5754M needs a special
firmware to enable TSO and bge(4) does not support firmware based
TSO.
Reported by: ed
Tested by: ed
Don't complain when we encounter the "cache" source, it's valid. Also fix
the error message to include a line feed and not include a stray comma.
PR: bin/121671
Submitted by: Artis Caune artis.caune gmail.com
Approved by: ed (mentor)
MFC after: 2 weeks
While here, change "> /dev/stderr" for more usual ">&2"
Submitted by: jilles
was broken w.r.t. byte range lock conflicts when it was the same client
and the request used the open_to_lock_owner4 case, since lckstp->ls_clp
was not set. This patch fixes it by using "clp" instead of "lckstp->ls_clp".
MFC after: 2 weeks
checking for conflicts w.r.t. byte range locks for NFSv4.
1 - Return 0 instead of EACCES when a conflict is found, for F_GETLK.
2 - Check for "same file" when checking for a conflict.
3 - Don't check for a conflict for the F_UNLCK case.
Even though it builds with WARNS=2, some users link sendmail from the
base system against SASL. This doesn't build in this case.
Reported by: Andrzej Tobola <ato iem pw edu pl>
(sblock.fs_magic == FS_UFS1_MAGIC) case, so the check within the
loop is redundant.
Submitted by: Nate Eldredge nge cs.hmc.edu
Reviewed by: mjacob
Approved by: ed (mentor)
MFC after: 1 month
the associated debugging under bootverbose.
- Remove freebsd4_sigreturn(); given that FreeBSD 4 didn't supported
sparc64 this only ever served as a transition aid prior to FreeBSD
5.0 and is unused by default since COMPAT_FREEBSD4 was removed from
GENERIC in r143072 nearly 5 years ago.
work.
- Sanity check the parameters passed to the implementations of the
pcib_{read,write}_config() methods. Using illegal values can cause
no real harm but it doesn't hurt to avoid unnecessary data error
traps requiring to flush and re-enable the level 1 caches.
Similar to libexec/, do the same with lib/. Make WARNS=6 the norm and
lower it when needed.
I'm setting WARNS?=0 for secure/. It seems secure/ includes the
Makefile.inc provided by lib/. I'm not going to touch that directory.
Most of the code there is contributed anyway.
Just like bin/ and sbin/, I think setting WARNS to the highest value
possible will make it more attractive for people to fix warnings.
- The WARNS variable is set in the Makefile in the directory of the
application itself, making it more likely that it will be removed out
of curiosity to see what happens.
- New applications will most likely build with WARNS=6 out of the box,
because the author would more likely fix the warnings during
development than lower WARNS.
Unfortunately almost all apps in libexec require a lowered value of
WARNS.
