Commit Graph

614 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Andriy Gapon
b804e37054 8331 zfs_unshare returns wrong error code for smb unshare failure
illumos/illumos-gate@4f4378cc54
4f4378cc54

https://www.illumos.org/issues/8331
  zfs_unshare returns EZFS_UNSHARENFSFAILED on error for all share types.

Reviewed by: Marcel Telka <marcel@telka.sk>
Reviewed by: Toomas Soome <tsoome@me.com>
Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@omniti.com>
Author: Andrew Stormont <astormont@racktopsystems.com>
2017-09-13 10:17:14 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
03ad5aa4c1 8569 problem with inline functions in abd.h
illumos/illumos-gate@37e84ab74e
37e84ab74e

https://www.illumos.org/issues/8569
  C [C99] has peculiar rules for inline functions that are different from the
  C++ rules.  Unlike C++ where inline is "fire and forget", in C a programmer
  must pay attention to the function's storage class / visibility.  The main
  problem is with the case where a compiler decides to not inline a call to the
  function declared as inline.
  Some relevant links:
  - http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.faqs/ka15831.html
  - http://www.drdobbs.com/the-new-c-inline-functions/184401540
  The summary is that either the inline functions should be declared 'static
  inline' or one of the compilation units (.c files) must provide a callable
  externally visible function definition.  In the former case, the compiler would
  automatically create a local non-inlined function instance in every compilation
  unit where it's needed.  In the latter case the single external definition is
  used to satisfy any non-inlined calls in all compilation units.  As things
  stand right now, we can get an undefined reference error under certain
  combinations of compilers and compiler options.  For example, this is what I
  get on FreeBSD when compiling with clang 4.0.0 and -O1:
    In function `abd_free': /usr/src/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/abd.c:385:
    undefined reference to `abd_is_linear'
  So, there are two alternatives. Either to qualify each inline function in
  abd.h with static storage class.  Or to add declarations like the following to
  abd.c: extern inline boolean_t abd_is_linear(abd_t *abd); Both work. I am not
  sure which one would be more consistent with the illumos development rules.

Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Author: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
2017-09-01 18:02:53 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
e08e3c87ce 8558 lwp_create() returns EAGAIN on system with more than 80K ZFS filesystems
illumos/illumos-gate@216d7723a1
216d7723a1

https://www.illumos.org/issues/8558
  On a system with more than 80K ZFS filesystems, we've seen cases where
  lwp_create() will start to fail by returning EAGAIN. The problem being,
  for each of those 80K ZFS filesystems, a taskq will be created for each
  dataset as part of the ZIL for each dataset.
  For each of these taskq's, a kernel thread will be created which results
  in 24KB being allocated for each thread. With enough of these 24KB
  allocations, we eventually exhaust the memory region set aside for these
  allocations. Currently, segkpsize is set to a value of 2GB, which means
  we can only support about 80K filesystems; 2GB / 24KB = ~80K.
  The lwp_create() failure comes into play due to the fact that LWP
  creation also allocates 24KB from this same region of memory. Thus, if
  we've exhausted this region of memory due to the number of ZIL taskq's,
  there won't be any memory avaible to allow the call to lwp_create() to
  succeed.

Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Sebastien Roy <sebastien.roy@delphix.com>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Author: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com>
2017-09-01 17:57:51 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
b5742b1e92 8435 zpool.1m and zfs.1m: minor cleanup
illumos/illumos-gate@a058d1cc57
a058d1cc57

https://www.illumos.org/issues/8435
  This commit is a result of re-read while porting zpool.1m to ZFSonLinux.
  See https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/commit/
  cda0317e4d2a1277b328e4fc42ee3699bbe46c12

https://www.illumos.org/issues/3796
  The listsnapshots property is not documented in the zpool man page.

3796 listsnapshots not documented in zpool man page
Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Yuri Pankov <yuripv@gmx.com>
Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com>
Author: George Melikov <mail@gmelikov.ru>
2017-09-01 17:56:34 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
efd3d79ea3 8414 Implemented zpool scrub pause/resume
illumos/illumos-gate@1702cce751
1702cce751

https://www.illumos.org/issues/8414
  This issue tracks the port of scrub pause from ZoL: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/6167
  Currently, there is no way to pause a scrub. Pausing may be useful when
 the pool is busy with other I/O to preserve bandwidth.

  Description

  This patch adds the ability to pause and resume scrubbing.  This is achieved
  by maintaining a persistent on-disk scrub state.  While the state is 'paused'
  we do not scrub any more blocks.  We do however perform regular scan
  housekeeping such as freeing async destroyed and deadlist blocks while paused.

  If you're testing this change, you probably want to include the patch from #6164

  Motivation and Context

  Scrub pausing can be an I/O intensive operation and people have been asking
  for the ability to pause a scrub for a while. This allows one to preserve scrub
  progress while freeing up bandwidth for other I/O.

  How Has This Been Tested?

  Unit testing and zfs-tests.  to the pool.  This patch will also include the
  patch from https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/ pull/6164 In certain cases
  (dsl_scan_sync() is one), we may end up calling

Reviewed by: George Melikov <mail@gmelikov.ru>
Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com>
Author: Alek Pinchuk <apinchuk@datto.com>
2017-09-01 17:43:08 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
7d823d46e5 8547 update mandoc to 1.14.3
illumos/illumos-gate@c66b804654
c66b804654

https://www.illumos.org/issues/8547
  update mandoc (now it's the official name) suite to new upstream version, which
  among a lot of fixes, brings in much improved eqn(5)/tbl(5) support.

Reviewed by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net>
Author: Yuri Pankov <yuri.pankov@nexenta.com>
2017-09-01 17:38:49 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
1493f2aba3 8300 fix man page issues found by mandoc 1.14.1
illumos/illumos-gate@72d3dbb9ab
72d3dbb9ab

https://www.illumos.org/issues/8300
  Prior to integrating the mdocml update to 1.14.1, fix issues found by new
  version, especially the "new sentence, new line" style rule.

Reviewed by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Reviewed by: Toomas Soome <tsoome@me.com>
Approved by: Gordon Ross <gwr@nexenta.com>
Author: Yuri Pankov <yuri.pankov@nexenta.com>
2017-09-01 17:37:10 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
e9b6f3f506 8138 Improve manpage spelling
illumos/illumos-gate@bccbd30bb6
bccbd30bb6

https://www.illumos.org/issues/8138
  While reading man pages, I've noticed a number of spelling mistakes
  and simple typos we should fix.

Reviewed by: Toomas Soome <tsoome@me.com>
Reviewed by: Cody Mello <melloc@joyent.com>
Reviewed by: Patrick Mooney <patrick.mooney@joyent.com>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Author: Peter Tribble <peter.tribble@gmail.com>
2017-09-01 17:35:27 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
739d7fa9c4 8508 Mounting a zpool on 32-bit platforms panics
illumos/illumos-gate@b11fe8c014
b11fe8c014

https://www.illumos.org/issues/8508
  Mounting a zpool on a 32-bit system triggers a panic in spa_history_log_version
  () due to a type format mismatch for ZPL_VERSION. ZPL_VERSION is a unsigned
  long long, but the format expects an integer. On 64-bit platforms this may not
  be an issue due to word size and alignment. On 32-bit platforms a word size is
  half that of a long long, causing the second word of the long long to be seen
  as the string pointer for utsname.nodename.

Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com>
Author: Justin Hibbits <chmeeedalf@gmail.com>
2017-08-08 11:27:19 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
9fdc44732a 8373 TXG_WAIT in ZIL commit path
illumos/illumos-gate@d28671a3b0
d28671a3b0

https://www.illumos.org/issues/8373
  The code that writes ZIL blocks uses dmu_tx_assign(TXG_WAIT) to assign a
  transaction to a transaction group.
  That seems to be logically incorrect as writing of the ZIL block does not
  introduce any new dirty data.
  Also, when there is a lot of dirty data, the call can introduce significant
  delays into the ZIL commit path,
  thus affecting all synchronous writes. Additionally, ARC throttling may affect
  the ZIL writing.
  We probably need a new mechanism similar to dmu_tx_create_assigned to assign
  ZIL transactions.
  (Ab)using TXG_WAITED does not seem to be sufficient.

Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com>
Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com>
Author: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
2017-08-08 11:24:13 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
23dbc36649 8491 uberblock on-disk padding to reserve space for smoothly merging zpool checkpoint & MMP in ZFS
illumos/illumos-gate@79c2b812ee
79c2b812ee

https://www.illumos.org/issues/8491
  The zpool checkpoint feature in DxOS added a new field in the uberblock.
  The Multi-Modifier Protection Pull Request from ZoL adds two new fields in the
  uberblock (Reference: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/6279).
  As these two changes come from two different sources and once upstreamed and
  deployed will introduce an incompatibility with each other we want
  to upstream a change that will reserve the padding for both of them so
  integration goes smoothly and everyone gets both features.

Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed by: Olaf Faaland <faaland1@llnl.gov>
Approved by: Gordon Ross <gwr@nexenta.com>
Author: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim@delphix.com>
2017-08-08 11:19:56 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
74a3d2b7c8 7915 checks in l2arc_evict could use some cleaning up
illumos/illumos-gate@267ae6c3a8
267ae6c3a8

https://www.illumos.org/issues/7915
  l2arc_evict() is strictly serialized with respect to l2arc_write_buffers() and
  l2arc_write_done().
  Normally, l2arc_evict() and l2arc_write_buffers() are called from the same
  thread, so they can not be concurrent.
  Also, l2arc_write_buffers() uses zio_wait() on the parent zio of all cache zio-
  s.
  That ensures that l2arc_write_done() is completed before l2arc_write_buffers()
  returns.
  Finally, if a cache device is removed, then l2arc_evict() is called under
  SCL_ALL in the exclusive mode.
  That ensures that it can not be concurrent with the normal L2ARC accesses to
  the device (including writing and evicting buffers).
  Given the above, some checks and actions in l2arc_evict() do not make sense.
  For instance, it must never encounter the write head header let alone remove it
  from the buffer list.

Reviewed by: Dan Kimmel <dan.kimmel@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com>
Approved by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Author: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
2017-08-08 11:15:36 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
5f25e25435 8126 ztest assertion failed in dbuf_dirty due to dn_nlevels changing
illumos/illumos-gate@dcb6872c56
dcb6872c56

https://www.illumos.org/issues/8126
  The sync thread is concurrently modifying dn_phys->dn_nlevels
  while dbuf_dirty() is trying to assert something about it, without
  holding the necessary lock. We need to move this assertion further down
  in the function, after we have acquired the dn_struct_rwlock.

Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim@delphix.com>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Author: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
2017-08-08 11:13:27 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
33f8e79f6a 8067 zdb should be able to dump literal embedded block pointer
illumos/illumos-gate@4923c69fdd
4923c69fdd

https://www.illumos.org/issues/8067
  Add an option to zdb to print a literal embedded block pointer supplied on the
  command line:
  zdb -E [-A] word0:word1:...:word15

Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Alex Reece <alex@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Yuri Pankov <yuri.pankov@gmail.com>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Author: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
2017-08-08 11:10:37 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
84e46b3cbd 8426 mark immutable buffer arguments as such in abd.h
illumos/illumos-gate@9b195260e2
9b195260e2

https://www.illumos.org/issues/8426
  abd_copy_from_buf and abd_cmp_buf do not modify their void *buf arguments, so
  qualify them with const.
  abd_copy_from_buf_off and abd_cmp_buf_off already had that type for the
  corresponding arguments.

Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Author: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
2017-08-08 10:58:01 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
fd6c8b414e 8430 dir_is_empty_readdir() doesn't properly handle error from fdopendir()
illumos/illumos-gate@ba6e7e6505
ba6e7e6505

https://www.illumos.org/issues/8430
  we should close dirfd if fdopendir() fails.

Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Dan Kimmel <dan.kimmel@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Yuri Pankov <yuri.pankov@nexenta.com>
Reviewed by: Igor Kozhukhov <igor@dilos.org>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Author: Sowrabha Gopal <sowrabha.gopal@delphix.com>
2017-08-08 10:55:42 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
59946bc86e 7600 zfs rollback should pass target snapshot to kernel
illumos/illumos-gate@77b171372e
77b171372e

https://www.illumos.org/issues/7600
  At present, the kernel side code seems to blindly rollback to whatever happens
  to be the latest snapshot at the time when the rollback task is processed.
  The expected target's name should be passed to the kernel driver and the sync
  task should validate that the target exists and that it is the latest snapshot
  indeed.

Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Author: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
2017-08-08 10:49:56 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
9ff5c34a7e 8377 Panic in bookmark deletion
illumos/illumos-gate@42418f9e73
42418f9e73

https://www.illumos.org/issues/8377
  The problem is that when dsl_bookmark_destroy_check() is executed from open
  context (the pre-check), it fills in dbda_success based on the existence of the
  bookmark.
  But the bookmark (or containing filesystem as in this case) can be destroyed
  before we get to syncing context. When we re-run dsl_bookmark_destroy_check()
  in syncing
  context, it will not add the deleted bookmark to dbda_success, intending for
  dsl_bookmark_destroy_sync() to not process it. But because the bookmark is
  still in dbda_success
  from the open-context call, we do try to destroy it.
  The fix is that dsl_bookmark_destroy_check() should not modify dbda_success
  when called from open context.

Reviewed by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Author: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
2017-08-08 10:47:56 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
28bfd86184 8378 crash due to bp in-memory modification of nopwrite block
illumos/illumos-gate@b7edcb9408
b7edcb9408

https://www.illumos.org/issues/8378
  The problem is that zfs_get_data() supplies a stale zgd_bp to dmu_sync(), which
  we then nopwrite against.
  zfs_get_data() doesn't hold any DMU-related locks, so after it copies db_blkptr
  to zgd_bp, dbuf_write_ready()
  could change db_blkptr, and dbuf_write_done() could remove the dirty record.
  dmu_sync() then sees the stale
  BP and that the dbuf it not dirty, so it is eligible for nop-writing.
  The fix is for dmu_sync() to copy db_blkptr to zgd_bp after acquiring the
  db_mtx. We could still see a stale
  db_blkptr, but if it is stale then the dirty record will still exist and thus
  we won't attempt to nopwrite.

Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Author: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
2017-08-08 10:44:48 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
fd454218f8 7910 l2arc_write_buffers() may write beyond target_sz
illumos/illumos-gate@16a7e5ac11
16a7e5ac11

https://www.illumos.org/issues/7910
  It seems that the change in issue #6950 resurrected the problem that was
  earlier fixed by the change in issue #5219.
  Please also see the following FreeBSD bug report: https://bugs.freebsd.org/
  bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216178

Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Dan Kimmel <dan.kimmel@delphix.com>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Author: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
2017-08-08 10:37:03 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
0ae34b751c 8416 abd.h is not C++ friendly
illumos/illumos-gate@5e2a074725
5e2a074725

https://www.illumos.org/issues/8416
  A C++ compiler fails to compile abd_is_linear(), which is an inline function
  defined in abd.h, with the following error:
       error: cannot initialize return object of type 'boolean_t' with an
       rvalue of type 'bool'
  That happens because a bool can not be converted to an enum in C++.
  That's a problem because abd.h can be visible through other header files that a
  C++ program that works with ZFS can include.

Reviewed by: Igor Kozhukhov <igor@dilos.org>
Reviewed by: Dan Kimmel <dan.kimmel@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Alek Pinchuk <pinchuk.alek@gmail.com>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Author: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
2017-08-08 10:31:42 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
32b3bd238f 8418 zfs_prop_get_table() call in zfs_validate_name() is a no-op
illumos/illumos-gate@e09ba01dcd
e09ba01dcd

https://www.illumos.org/issues/8418
  The following line in zfs_validate_name() is just a no-op and it should be
  removed:
  108    (void) zfs_prop_get_table();

Reviewed by: Vitaliy Gusev <gusev.vitaliy@icloud.com>
Approved by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Author: Marcel Telka <marcel@telka.sk>
2017-08-08 10:28:01 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
ecbf7dec14 8311 ZFS_READONLY is a little too strict
illumos/illumos-gate@2889ec41c0
2889ec41c0

https://www.illumos.org/issues/8311
  Description:
  There was a misunderstanding about the enforcement details of the "Read-only"
  flag introduced for SMB/CIFS compatibility, way back in 2007 in the Sun PSARC
  2007/315 case.
  The original authors thought enforcement of the READONLY flag should work
  similarly as the IMMUTABLE flag. Unfortunately, that enforcement is
  incompatible with the expectations of Windows applications using this feature
  through the SMB service. Applications assume (and the MS File System Algorithms
  MS-FSA confirms they should) that an SMB client can:
  (a) Open an SMB handle on a file with read/write access,
  (b) Set the DOS attributes to include the READONLY flag,
  (c) continue to have write access via that handle.
  This access model is essentially the same as a Unix/POSIX application that
  creates a file (with read/write access), uses fchmod() to change the file mode
  to something not granting write access (i.e. 0444), and then continues to write
  that file using the open handle it got before the mode change.
  Currently, the SMB server works-around this problem in a way that will become
  difficult to maintain as we implement support for SMB3 persistent handles, so
  SMB depends on this fix.
  I've written a test program that can be used to demonstrate this problem, and
  added it to zfs-tests (tests/functional/acl/cifs/cifs_attr_004_pos).
  It currently fails, but will pass when this problem fixed.
  Steps to Reproduce:
    Run the test program on a ZFS file system.
  Expected Results:
    Pass
  Actual Results:
    Fail.

Reviewed by: Sanjay Nadkarni <sanjay.nadkarni@nexenta.com>
Reviewed by: Yuri Pankov <yuri.pankov@nexenta.com>
Reviewed by: Andrew Stormont <andyjstormont@gmail.com>
Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: John Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com>
Approved by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com>
Author: Gordon Ross <gwr@nexenta.com>
2017-06-14 16:46:49 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
b06c8f09e9 5220 L2ARC does not support devices that do not provide 512B access
illumos/illumos-gate@403a8da73c
403a8da73c

https://www.illumos.org/issues/5220
  There are disk devices that have logical sector size larger than 512B, for
  example 4KB. That is, their physical sector size is larger than 512B and they
  do not provide emulation for 512B sector sizes. For such devices both a data
  offset and a data size must be properly aligned. L2ARC should arrange that
  because it uses physical I/O.
  zio_vdev_io_start() performs a necessary transformation if io_size is not
  aligned to vdev_ashift, but that is done only for logical I/O. Something
  similar should be done in L2ARC code.
      * a temporary write buffer should be allocated if the original buffer is
        not going to be compressed and its size is not aligned
      * size of a temporary compression buffer should be ashift aligned
      * for the reads, if a size of a target buffer is not sufficiently large and
        it is not aligned then a temporary read buffer should be allocated

Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Dan Kimmel <dan.kimmel@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Saso Kiselkov <saso.kiselkov@nexenta.com>
Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com>
Author: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
2017-06-14 16:44:10 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
4b16e7e931 5428 provide fts(), reallocarray(), and strtonum()
illumos/illumos-gate@4585130b25
4585130b25

https://www.illumos.org/issues/5428

Reviewed by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Approved by: Joshua M. Clulow <josh@sysmgr.org>
Author: Yuri Pankov <yuri.pankov@nexenta.com>
2017-06-14 16:36:01 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
e460d6ff6b 8264 want support for promoting datasets in libzfs_core
illumos/illumos-gate@a4b8c9aa65
a4b8c9aa65

https://www.illumos.org/issues/8264
  Oddly there is a lzc_clone function, but no lzc_promote function.

Reviewed by: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@kebe.com>
Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@kebe.com>
Author: Andrew Stormont <astormont@racktopsystems.com>
2017-06-14 16:27:54 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
71672e5c5d 8264 want support for promoting datasets in libzfs_core
illumos/illumos-gate@a4b8c9aa65
a4b8c9aa65

https://www.illumos.org/issues/8264
  Oddly there is a lzc_clone function, but no lzc_promote function.

Reviewed by: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@kebe.com>
Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@kebe.com>
Author: Andrew Stormont <astormont@racktopsystems.com>
2017-06-14 16:23:15 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
acb89578f1 fix up r319744, add new files
8269 dtrace stddev aggregation is normalized incorrectly

illumos/illumos-gate@79809f9cf4
79809f9cf4

https://www.illumos.org/issues/8269
  It seems that currently normalization of stddev aggregation is done
  incorrectly.
  We divide both the sum of values and the sum of their squares by the
  normalization factor. But we should divide the sum of squares by the
  normalization factor squared to scale the original values properly.

Reviewed by: Bryan Cantrill <bryan@joyent.com>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Author: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
2017-06-09 15:06:50 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
79edb7989a 8269 dtrace stddev aggregation is normalized incorrectly
illumos/illumos-gate@79809f9cf4
79809f9cf4

https://www.illumos.org/issues/8269
  It seems that currently normalization of stddev aggregation is done
  incorrectly.
  We divide both the sum of values and the sum of their squares by the
  normalization factor. But we should divide the sum of squares by the
  normalization factor squared to scale the original values properly.

Reviewed by: Bryan Cantrill <bryan@joyent.com>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Author: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
2017-06-09 15:04:10 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
27ba1b79ca 8108 zdb -l fails to read labels 2 and 3
illumos/illumos-gate@22c8b9583d
22c8b9583d

https://www.illumos.org/issues/8108

Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Toomas Soome <tsoome@me.com>
Reviewed by: Igor Kozhukhov <igor@dilos.org>
Reviewed by: Andrew Stormont <andyjstormont@gmail.com>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Author: Yuri Pankov <yuri.pankov@nexenta.com>
2017-06-09 15:03:07 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
e45762f8b4 8056 zfs send size estimate is inaccurate for some zvols
illumos/illumos-gate@0255edcc85
0255edcc85

https://www.illumos.org/issues/8056
  The send size estimate for a zvol can be too low, if the size of the record
  headers (dmu_replay_record_t's) is a significant portion of the size.
  This is typically the case when the data is highly compressible, especially
  with embedded blocks.
  The problem is that dmu_adjust_send_estimate_for_indirects() assumes that
  blocks are the size of the "recordsize" property (128KB).
  However, for zvols, the blocks are the size of the "volblocksize" property
  (8KB). Therefore, we estimate that there will be 16x less record headers than
  there really will be.

Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Author: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com>
2017-06-09 15:02:07 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
5243698560 8156 dbuf_evict_notify() does not need dbuf_evict_lock
illumos/illumos-gate@dbfd9f9300
dbfd9f9300

https://www.illumos.org/issues/8156
  dbuf_evict_notify() holds the dbuf_evict_lock while checking if it should do
  the eviction itself (because the evict thread is not able to keep up).
  This can result in massive lock contention.
  It isn't necessary to hold the lock, because if we make the wrong choice
  occasionally, nothing bad will happen.

Reviewed by: Dan Kimmel <dan.kimmel@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Author: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
2017-06-09 15:01:18 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
1cb31ff6a4 8168 NULL pointer dereference in zfs_create()
illumos/illumos-gate@690031d326
690031d326

https://www.illumos.org/issues/8168
  If we manage to export the pool on which we are creating a dataset (filesystem
  or zvol) between entering libzfs`zfs_create() and libzfs`zpool_open() call (for
  which we never check the return value) we end up dereferencing a NULL pointer
  in libzfs`zpool_close().
  This was discovered on ZFS on Linux. The same issue can be reproduced on
  Illumos running in parallel:
    while :; do zpool import -d /tmp testpool ; zpool export testpool ; done
    while :; do zfs create testpool/fs; zfs destroy testpool/fs ; done
  Eventually this will result in several core dumps like this one:
  [root@52-54-00-d3-7a-01 /cores]# mdb core.zfs.4244
  Loading modules: [ libumem.so.1 libc.so.1 libtopo.so.1 libavl.so.1
  libnvpair.so.1 ld.so.1 ]
  > ::stack
  libzfs.so.1`zpool_close+0x17(0, 0, 0, 8047450)
  libzfs.so.1`zfs_create+0x1bb(8090548, 8047e6f, 1, 808cba8)
  zfs_do_create+0x545(2, 8047d74, 80778a0, 801, 0, 3)
  main+0x22c(8047d2c, fef5c6e8, 8047d64, 8055a17, 3, 8047d70)
  _start+0x83(3, 8047e64, 8047e68, 8047e6f, 0, 8047e7b)
  >
  Fix and reproducer (systemtap): https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/6096

Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Author: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com>
2017-06-09 15:00:13 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
acabd65c2a 8005 poor performance of 1MB writes on certain RAID-Z configurations
illumos/illumos-gate@5b06278253
5b06278253

https://www.illumos.org/issues/8005
  RAID-Z requires that space be allocated in multiples of P+1 sectors,
  because this is the minimum size block that can have the required amount
  of parity. Thus blocks on RAIDZ1 must be allocated in a multiple of 2
  sectors; on RAIDZ2 multiple of 3; and on RAIDZ3 multiple of 4. A sector
  is a unit of 2^ashift bytes, typically 512B or 4KB.
  To satisfy this constraint, the allocation size is rounded up to the
  proper multiple, resulting in up to 3 "pad sectors" at the end of some
  blocks. The contents of these pad sectors are not used, so we do not
  need to read or write these sectors. However, some storage hardware
  performs much worse (around 1/2 as fast) on mostly-contiguous writes
  when there are small gaps of non-overwritten data between the writes.
  Therefore, ZFS creates "optional" zio's when writing RAID-Z blocks that
  include pad sectors. If writing a pad sector will fill the gap between
  two (required) writes, we will issue the optional zio, thus doubling
  performance. The gap-filling performance improvement was introduced in
  July 2009.
  Writing the optional zio is done by the io aggregation code in
  vdev_queue.c. The problem is that it is also subject to the limit on
  the size of aggregate writes, zfs_vdev_aggregation_limit, which is by
  default 128KB. For a given block, if the amount of data plus padding
  written to a leaf device exceeds zfs_vdev_aggregation_limit, the
  optional zio will not be written, resulting in a ~2x performance
  degradation.
  The problem occurs only for certain values of ashift, compressed block
  size, and RAID-Z configuration (number of parity and data disks). It
  cannot occur with the default recordsize=128KB. If compression is
  enabled, all configurations with recordsize=1MB or larger will be
  impacted to some degree.
  The problem notably occurs with recordsize=1MB, compression=off, with 10
  disks in a RAIDZ2 or RAIDZ3 group (with 512B or 4KB sectors). Therefore

Reviewed by: Saso Kiselkov <saso.kiselkov@nexenta.com>
Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Author: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
2017-06-09 14:58:51 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
02ae6a9ae6 8155 simplify dmu_write_policy handling of pre-compressed buffers
illumos/illumos-gate@adaec86ad2
adaec86ad2

https://www.illumos.org/issues/8155
  When writing pre-compressed buffers, arc_write() requires that the compression
  algorithm used to compress the buffer matches the compression algorithm
  requested by the zio_prop_t, which is set by dmu_write_policy().
  This makes dmu_write_policy() and its callers a bit more complicated.
  We can simplify this by making arc_write() trust the caller to supply the type
  of pre-compressed buffer that it wants to write, and override the compression
  setting in the zio_prop_t.

Reviewed by: Dan Kimmel <dan.kimmel@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Author: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
2017-06-09 14:57:45 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
cc03e98a7b 6939 add sysevents to zfs core for commands
illumos/illumos-gate@ce1577b049
ce1577b049

https://www.illumos.org/issues/6939
  Originally created https://smartos.org/bugview/OS-4489
       sysevents should be fired in the kernel from ZFS whenever a command
       is run that is logged in zpool history.
  Example output
  Terminal 1
  root - gz sunos ~ # zfs create zones/foobar
  root - gz sunos ~ # zfs set quota=10g zones/foobar
  root - gz sunos ~ # zfs destroy zones/foobar
  Terminal 2
  root - gz sunos ~ # sysevent EC_zfs
  nvlist version: 0
      date = 2016-04-28T14:50:08.964Z
      vendor = SUNW
      publisher = zfs
      class = EC_zfs
      subclass = ESC_ZFS_history_event
      pid = 0
      data = (embedded nvlist)
      nvlist version: 0
          pool_name = zones
          pool_guid = 0x40c964e8f9a7a694
          history_record = (embedded nvlist)
          nvlist version: 0
              dsname = zones/foobar
              dsid = 0x1525
              history internal str =
              internal_name = create
              history txg = 0x4c4ef3

Reviewed by: Patrick Mooney <patrick.mooney@joyent.com>
Reviewed by: Joshua M. Clulow <jmc@joyent.com>
Reviewed by: Josh Wilsdon <jwilsdon@joyent.com>
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Richard Elling <Richard.Elling@RichardElling.com>
Reviewed by: Alan Somers <asomers@gmail.com>
Reviewed by: Andrew Stormont <andyjstormont@gmail.com>
Approved by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Author: Dave Eddy <dave@daveeddy.com>
2017-06-09 14:56:17 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
a168c6e861 6396 remove SVM
illumos/illumos-gate@5f10ef697f
5f10ef697f

https://www.illumos.org/issues/6396
  LVM = SVM = Solaris Volume Manager
  dead code and not using with ZFS based platform.

Reviewed by: Igor Kozhukhov <ikozhukhov@gmail.com>
Reviewed by: Toomas Soome <tsoome@me.com>
Approved by: Hans Rosenfeld <rosenfeld@grumpf.hope-2000.org>
Author: Yuri Pankov <yuri.pankov@nexenta.com>
2017-06-09 14:55:12 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
3899d91a09 7578 Fix/improve some aspects of ZIL writing.
illumos/illumos-gate@c5ee46810f
c5ee46810f

https://www.illumos.org/issues/7578
  After some ZIL changes 6 years ago zil_slog_limit got partially broken
  due to zl_itx_list_sz not updated when async itx'es upgraded to sync.
  Actually because of other changes about that time zl_itx_list_sz is not
  really required to implement the functionality, so this patch removes
  some unneeded broken code and variables.
  Original idea of zil_slog_limit was to reduce chance of SLOG abuse by
  single heavy logger, that increased latency for other (more latency critical)
  loggers, by pushing heavy log out into the main pool instead of SLOG. Beside
  huge latency increase for heavy writers, this implementation caused double
  write of all data, since the log records were explicitly prepared for SLOG.
  Since we now have I/O scheduler, I've found it can be much more efficient
  to reduce priority of heavy logger SLOG writes from ZIO_PRIORITY_SYNC_WRITE
  to ZIO_PRIORITY_ASYNC_WRITE, while still leave them on SLOG.
  Existing ZIL implementation had problem with space efficiency when it
  has to write large chunks of data into log blocks of limited size. In some
  cases efficiency stopped to almost as low as 50%. In case of ZIL stored on
  spinning rust, that also reduced log write speed in half, since head had to
  uselessly fly over allocated but not written areas. This change improves
  the situation by offloading problematic operations from z*_log_write() to
  zil_lwb_commit(), which knows real situation of log blocks allocation and
  can split large requests into pieces much more efficiently. Also as side
  effect it removes one of two data copy operations done by ZIL code WR_COPIED
  case.
  While there, untangle and unify code of z*_log_write() functions.
  Also zfs_log_write() alike to zvol_log_write() can now handle writes crossing
  block boundary, that may also improve efficiency if ZPL is made to do that.

Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
Reviewed by: Steven Hartland <steven.hartland@multiplay.co.uk>
Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Richard Elling <Richard.Elling@RichardElling.com>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Author: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
2017-05-26 12:13:58 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
d7f3871103 8021 ARC buf data scatter-ization
8100 8021 seems to cause random BAD TRAP: type=d (#gp General protection)

illumos/illumos-gate@770499e185
770499e185

https://www.illumos.org/issues/8021
  The ARC buf data project (known simply as "ABD" since its genesis in the ZoL
  community) changes the way the ARC allocates `b_pdata` memory from using linear
  `void *` buffers to using scatter/gather lists of fixed-size 1KB chunks. This
  improves ZFS's performance by helping to defragment the address space occupied
  by the ARC, in particular for cases where compressed ARC is enabled. It could
  also ease future work to allocate pages directly from `segkpm` for minimal-
  overhead memory allocations, bypassing the `kmem` subsystem.
  This is essentially the same change as the one which recently landed in ZFS on
  Linux, although they made some platform-specific changes while adapting this
  work to their codebase:
  1. Implemented the equivalent of the `segkpm` suggestion for future work
  mentioned above to bypass issues that they've had with the Linux kernel memory
  allocator.
  2. Changed the internal representation of the ABD's scatter/gather list so it
  could be used to pass I/O directly into Linux block device drivers. (This
  feature is not available in the illumos block device interface yet.)

https://www.illumos.org/issues/8100
  My supermicro system is getting random BAD TRAP: type=d (#gp General
  protection) at about the stage where ZFS filesystems are mounted - usually
  console login prompt is already present but the services are still starting.
  After backing out 8021, the boot is completed and no panics do occur.
  Machine does dump, however savecore fails:
  savecore: bad magic number baddcafe
  I can get more data out with boot -k, if needed.
  # psrinfo -vp
  The physical processor has 4 cores and 8 virtual processors (0-7)
    The core has 2 virtual processors (0 4)
    The core has 2 virtual processors (1 5)
    The core has 2 virtual processors (2 6)
    The core has 2 virtual processors (3 7)
      x86 (GenuineIntel 306C3 family 6 model 60 step 3 clock 3500 MHz)
        Intel(r) Xeon(r) CPU E3-1246 v3 @ 3.50GHz

  # prtconf -m
  32657

  $ zpool status
    pool: rpool
   state: ONLINE
    scan: none requested
  config:

          NAME        STATE     READ WRITE CKSUM
          rpool       ONLINE       0     0     0
            raidz1-0  ONLINE       0     0     0
              c3t0d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
              c3t1d0  ONLINE       0     0     0

Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens mahrens@delphix.com
Reviewed by: George Wilson george.wilson@delphix.com
Reviewed by: Paul Dagnelie pcd@delphix.com
Reviewed by: John Kennedy john.kennedy@delphix.com
Reviewed by: Prakash Surya prakash.surya@delphix.com
Reviewed by: Prashanth Sreenivasa pks@delphix.com
Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov pavel.zakharov@delphix.com
Reviewed by: Chris Williamson chris.williamson@delphix.com
Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net>
Author: Dan Kimmel <dan.kimmel@delphix.com>
2017-05-26 12:13:27 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
a8aa933b61 8265 Reserve send stream flag for large dnode feature
illumos/illumos-gate@bc83969fdb
bc83969fdb

https://www.illumos.org/issues/8265
  Reserve bit 23 in the zfs send stream flags for the large
  dnode feature which has been implemented for Linux.

Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Author: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
2017-05-26 12:07:47 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
f45d37d04e 8166 zpool scrub thinks it repaired offline device
illumos/illumos-gate@2d2f193a21
2d2f193a21

https://www.illumos.org/issues/8166
  If we do a scrub while a leaf device is offline (via "zpool offline"),
  we will inadvertently clear the DTL (dirty time log) of the offline
  device, even though it is still damaged. When the device comes back
  online, we will incompletely resilver it, thinking that the scrub
  repaired blocks written before the scrub was started. The incomplete
  resilver can lead to data loss if there is a subsequent failure of a
  different leaf device.
  The fix is to never clear the DTL of offline devices. Note that if a
  device is onlined while a scrub is in progress, the scrub will be
  restarted.
  The problem can be worked around by running "zpool scrub" after
  "zpool online".
  See also https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/issues/5806

Reviewed by: George Wilson george.wilson@delphix.com
Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com>
Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net>
Author: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
2017-05-26 12:02:51 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
9df2d6f729 7446 zpool create should support efi system partition
illumos/illumos-gate@7855d95b30
7855d95b30

https://www.illumos.org/issues/7446
  Since we support whole-disk configuration for boot pool, we also will need
  whole disk support with UEFI boot and for this, zpool create should create efi-
  system partition.
  I have borrowed the idea from oracle solaris, and introducing zpool create -
  B switch to provide an way to specify that boot partition should be created.
  However, there is still an question, how big should the system partition be.
  For time being, I have set default size 256MB (thats minimum size for FAT32
  with 4k blocks). To support custom size, the set on creation "bootsize"
  property is created and so the custom size can be set as: zpool create B -
  o bootsize=34MB rpool c0t0d0
  After pool is created, the "bootsize" property is read only. When -B switch is
  not used, the bootsize defaults to 0 and is shown in zpool get output with
  value ''. Older zfs/zpool implementations are ignoring this property.
  https://www.illumos.org/rb/r/219/

Reviewed by: Andrew Stormont <andyjstormont@gmail.com>
Reviewed by: Yuri Pankov <yuri.pankov@gmail.com>
Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@kebe.com>
Author: Toomas Soome <tsoome@me.com>
2017-05-26 12:02:14 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
ab57ddbb43 7956 "minimum" is misspelled in zpool manpage
illumos/illumos-gate@eba8726136
eba8726136

https://www.illumos.org/issues/7956

Reviewed by: Prashanth Sreenivasa <pks@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Sebastien Roy <sebastien.roy@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Yuri Pankov <yuri.pankov@gmail.com>
Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net>
Author: Brad Lewis <blewis@delphix.com>
2017-05-26 12:00:31 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
5fbf54a543 6418 zpool should have a label clearing command
illumos/illumos-gate@6401734d54
6401734d54

https://www.illumos.org/issues/6418
  An easy, direct means of sanitizing pool vdevs can be helpful for management
  purposes.
  FreeBSD has had a 'zpool labelclear' for some time, see: https://
  svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=224171
  SpectraBSD has a slightly updated version, which I propose for inclusion.

Reviewed by: Yuri Pankov <yuri.pankov@nexenta.com>
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Author: Will Andrews <will@firepipe.net>

Note: the bulk of the change has been already imported, this is a follow
up that imports zpool.1m changes.
2017-05-26 11:59:20 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
23d34c4278 6781 zpool man page needs updated to remove duplicate entry of "cannot be" where it discusses cache devices
illumos/illumos-gate@e4cb59f791
e4cb59f791

https://www.illumos.org/issues/6781
    cache
    A device used to cache storage pool data. A cache device cannot
    be cannot be configured as a mirror or raidz group. For more
    information, see the "Cache Devices" section.
  needs changed to
    cache
    A device used to cache storage pool data. A cache device cannot
    be configured as a mirror or raidz group. For more
    information, see the "Cache Devices" section.

Reviewed by: Toomas Soome <tsoome@me.com>
Reviewed by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Approved by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Author: Alexander Pyhalov <apyhalov@gmail.com>
2017-05-26 11:56:28 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
15a3493f4e 2897 "zpool split" documentation missing from manpage
illumos/illumos-gate@879bece34e
879bece34e

https://www.illumos.org/issues/2897
  Found this option in some Oracle documentation and wanted to check out the
  zpool manpage on it in OI. Unfortunately it seems to be missing from the
  manpage, so I first thought it was unsupported. However, "# zpool split" does
  print the correct usage. Testing with the "-n" switch makes me believe it is
  supported (I don't actually need to split my pool).

Reviewed by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@omniti.com>
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Approved by: Hans Rosenfeld <rosenfeld@grumpf.hope-2000.org>
Author: Steven Burgess <sburgess@datto.com>
2017-05-26 11:55:31 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
a1a27d6fd4 4465 zpool(1M) is able to offline cache vdevs despite what man page says
5659 in the manual page for zpool(1M), one misuse of the word 'zpool' to describe a pool

illumos/illumos-gate@c8323d4323
c8323d4323

https://www.illumos.org/issues/4465
  zpool(1M) is able to offline cache vdevs despite man page saying that it isn't:
         zpool offline [-t] pool device ...
             Takes the specified physical device offline. While the device is
             offline, no attempt is made to read or write to the device.

             This command is not applicable to spares or cache devices.
  altair:root:~# zpool create testoff c9t67d0 cache c9t71d0
  altair:root:~# zpool status testoff
    pool: testoff
   state: ONLINE
    scan: none requested
  config:

          NAME        STATE     READ WRITE CKSUM
          testoff     ONLINE       0     0     0
            c9t67d0   ONLINE       0     0     0
          cache
            c9t71d0   ONLINE       0     0     0

  errors: No known data errors
  altair:root:~# zpool offline testoff c9t71d0
  altair:root:~# zpool status testoff
    pool: testoff
   state: ONLINE
  status: One or more devices has been taken offline by the administrator.
          Sufficient replicas exist for the pool to continue functioning in a
          degraded state.
  action: Online the device using 'zpool online' or replace the device with
          'zpool replace'.
    scan: none requested

https://www.illumos.org/issues/5659
  At https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/blob/master/usr/src/man/man1m/
  zpool.1m#L931
       Do not add a disk that is currently configured as a quorum device to
       a zpool.
  – should be:
       Do not add a disk that is currently configured as a quorum device to
       a pool.

Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Approved by: Hans Rosenfeld <rosenfeld@grumpf.hope-2000.org>
Author: Yuri Pankov <yuri.pankov@nexenta.com>
2017-05-26 11:54:42 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
2053e2d0d0 8070 Add some ZFS comments
illumos/illumos-gate@40713f2b24
40713f2b24

https://www.illumos.org/issues/8070
  Add some ZFS comments left by various developers at different times

Reviewed by: Yuri Pankov <yuri.pankov@gmail.com>
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Author: Alan Somers <asomers@gmail.com>
2017-05-26 11:48:29 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
5ce561a2f5 8064 need a static DTrace probe in VN_HOLD
illumos/illumos-gate@ade42b557a
ade42b557a

https://www.illumos.org/issues/8064
  It's currently nearly impossible to trace what process places a hold on
  a vnode, as the only ways holds are place is via the `VN_HOLD()` and
  `VN_HOLD_CALLER()` macros, which inline the bumping of `v_count`. Adding
  static DTrace probes to these macros would enable tracing of where
  specific vnode references come from.
  For completeness and symmetry, a similar static probe should be added to
  `vn_rele()` and `vn_rele_dnlc()`.

Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Prashanth Sreenivasa <pks@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Author: Sebastien Roy <seb@delphix.com>
2017-05-26 11:39:34 +00:00
Andriy Gapon
f9e7ac9d61 8063 verify that we do not attempt to access inactive txg
illumos/illumos-gate@b7b2590dd9
b7b2590dd9

https://www.illumos.org/issues/8063
  A standard practice in ZFS is to keep track of "per-txg" state. Any of
  the 3 active TXG's (open, quiescing, syncing) can have different values
  for this state. We should assert that we do not attempt to modify other
  (inactive) TXG's.

Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Author: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
2017-05-26 11:35:34 +00:00