Peter Wemm 845ccef4b8 A hack basically.. We have a bunch of code that used to call
devsw_module_handler() indirectly and not use the chain arguments.  To
eliminate this indirection via that function (which does nothing now)
without duplicating a modevent handler into all the routines that don't
presently have one, supply a NOP (do nothing, return OK) routine which
is functionally equivalent to what's there now.  This is a hack and is
still wrong, because there doesn't appear to be anything to reclaim
resources on an unload of a module with one of these in it.  I'm not
sure whether to make the NOP handler refuse a MOD_UNLOAD event or what.
1999-11-08 06:53:30 +00:00
..
1999-08-28 01:08:13 +00:00
1999-10-29 18:09:36 +00:00
1999-10-29 18:09:36 +00:00
1999-10-29 18:09:36 +00:00
1999-08-28 01:08:13 +00:00
1999-08-28 01:08:13 +00:00
1999-08-28 01:08:13 +00:00
1999-10-29 18:09:36 +00:00
1999-10-04 18:29:51 +00:00
1999-08-28 01:08:13 +00:00
1999-10-11 15:00:09 +00:00
1999-10-29 18:09:36 +00:00
1999-10-29 18:09:36 +00:00
1999-08-19 16:06:08 +00:00
1999-09-29 15:03:48 +00:00
1999-08-28 01:08:13 +00:00
1999-08-28 01:08:13 +00:00
1999-08-28 01:08:13 +00:00
1999-10-29 18:09:36 +00:00
1999-10-29 18:09:36 +00:00
1999-08-28 01:08:13 +00:00
1999-08-28 01:08:13 +00:00
1999-10-05 21:19:41 +00:00
1999-10-29 18:09:36 +00:00
1999-08-28 01:08:13 +00:00
1999-08-28 01:08:13 +00:00
1999-08-28 01:08:13 +00:00
1999-08-28 01:08:13 +00:00
1999-08-28 01:08:13 +00:00
1999-10-12 02:54:23 +00:00
1999-08-28 01:08:13 +00:00
1999-10-29 18:09:36 +00:00
1999-10-29 18:09:36 +00:00
1999-08-28 01:08:13 +00:00
1999-08-28 01:08:13 +00:00
1999-08-28 01:08:13 +00:00
1999-10-29 18:09:36 +00:00
1999-08-28 01:08:13 +00:00
1999-09-29 15:03:48 +00:00
1999-08-28 01:08:13 +00:00
1999-08-28 01:08:13 +00:00
1999-09-29 15:03:48 +00:00
1999-08-28 01:08:13 +00:00
1999-11-01 15:03:20 +00:00
1999-10-29 18:09:36 +00:00
1999-10-29 18:09:36 +00:00
1999-10-29 18:09:36 +00:00
1999-10-29 18:09:36 +00:00
1999-11-08 03:32:15 +00:00