Coverity complains that this statement is not needed as the goto
label is on the next line anyway. Remove the if statement.
653 ret = ipn3ke_cfg_parse_i40e_pf_ethdev(afu_name, pf_name);
CID 337930 (#1 of 1): Identical code for different branches
(IDENTICAL_BRANCHES)identical_branches: The same code is executed
when the condition ret is true or false, because the code in the
if-then branch and after the if statement is identical. Should
the if statement be removed?
654 if (ret)
655 goto end;
implicit_else: The code from the above if-then branch is identical
to the code after the if statement.
656end:
Coverity issue: 337930
Fixes: c01c748e4a ("net/ipn3ke: add new driver")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Rosen Xu <rosen.xu@intel.com>
d28ae28eb7