io_device is registered, but never release.
It will lead spdk_io_device_register to fail
because allocate new io_device may reuse the same memory address.
Change-Id: I3359ed783c1df43ef382669d9d73d06bfbc1fe2d
Signed-off-by: Li Feng <lifeng1519@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424235
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: GangCao <gang.cao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
I observed that spdk_nvmf_qpair_disconnect is only ever called
from the thread that owns the qpair - i.e. the one associated
with the poll group - with only one exception where the qpair
wasn't fully initialized. Add a check that enforces this
condition, as it will allow some major simplifications.
Change-Id: Ied434c9ea63fd4f2a6f9eacdf8f3f26a7b6bcf3f
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424591
Reviewed-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell5141@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
This was the only usage of spdk_nvmf_qpair_disconnect that
was not being called from the owning thread. Send a message
here so that spdk_nvmf_qpair_disconnect can be simplified
later.
Change-Id: Ic5fae4503a95f7183079a02544812a9fc5d4def5
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424592
Reviewed-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell5141@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
While here, clean up the trace application output based
on some debugging done with these tracepoints.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: Iaf79f0ff8c80d0a6b9768ae0da213d57e98ec552
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424286
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
This was added a long time back for tracking an rte_mbuf
whose buffer was a different rte_mbuf - all related to
a userspace TCP stack that is no longer in development.
The concept isn't useful now, so remove it to reduce
the complexity of the tracing code.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I310e492eba7f55df242bb29d82fb19f6daee1f51
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424565
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Now that we do not unlink shared memory trace files
if the user has specified tracepoint flags, it is
possible to run out of shm space.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I713eb15a4067969ffcb6c95009c589d8e71e8d55
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424356
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
The scenario is as follows:
spdk_get_io_channel(...)
spdk_put_io_channel(...) <- sends a message to do the release
spdk_get_io_channel(...)
spdk_put_io_channel(...) <- sends a message to do the release again
_spdk_put_io_channel(...)
_spdk_put_io_channel(...) <- boom
Change-Id: I86a66c68a525964e0d2dcd9cac2c292dc8b43136
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424141
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
This is a string name used for debugging only.
Change-Id: I9827f0e6c83be7bc13951c7b5f0951ce6c2a1ece
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424127
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
This makes the implementation of that function better fit the name.
Control of checking whether the lvs is null is passed to the functions
that call verify_lvol_name
Change-Id: Iedaf3e332797af00161b91e526805151778ae679
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424579
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
This is in response to a scan-build error introduced with clang 6.0
Change-Id: Iee5a2538ec9a6575e5b3087bf43b8ded5d099fe7
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424576
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
The value of sizeof(".lock") already includes null byte
Change-Id: I521739f0a2b47e662e4f1f39c274afd38391f036
Signed-off-by: wuzhouhui <wuzhouhui@kingsoft.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423980
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pawel Wodkowski <pawelx.wodkowski@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ia728b4334a4f6abacdd94eecc45e27697e29522a
Signed-off-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424458
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
This allows us to use the tracepoints as forensics when
a crash occurs - basically a high-powered trace buffer.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I27f6c7a196501b4100cfc19c0354f2c6095ff3bb
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424282
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
This will allow us to filter tracepoints based on
the connection that generated them.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I3570c6613e477f4e14a85266b7e01f0fcb77f5db
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424280
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
This is a variant of spdk_trace_record which takes a tsc
parameter. This allows callers who already have the
current tsc to pass it in as a parameter, saving an extra
rdtsc in the trace library.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I074f4f9fdbe649ad6717f932982a574bc61f2997
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424277
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
This reduces overhead of spdk_trace_record calls when
tracing is not enabled.
While here, remove a couple of unit test stubs for
spdk_trace_record that weren't needed anymore.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I2cbb91e7d3311d95444d663f466d846676d2dcce
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424276
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
This makes it easier to debug failures.
Change-Id: Ic1099ec08308d5e50dd9fe03798dc0873579f2cc
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423961
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
These don't do anything yet.
Change-Id: I718c6fb19c059a39bc5cb360c3da47ec05bfa416
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423767
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
There could be cases (especially in virtualized and/or test
environments) where we could accumulate significant skew in
the timeslice frequency. Rather than depend on the application
framework to try to guarantee the rate of timeslice poller
callbacks, keep track internally of the last time the poller
was invoked. If/when we accumulate and detect skew equivalent
to one or more timeslices, increase the allowed IO and bandwidth
of the next timeslice to accomodate.
Since bdev poller now calls spdk_get_ticks() to do accounting,
this patch also fixes up the increment_time() unit test function
and the test env layer to properly increment the fake TSC.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: Iba301ddc0fb3d02042106a8bf6e4a6a9a84dc263
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423580
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: GangCao <gang.cao@intel.com>
buf is no longer needed, now that RAID I/O will never
span a strip boundary.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: Icc03b985f540797597c238005bf9883f6f8ad010
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423406
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
This is in response to a Scan-build error with Clang 6.0 but is a real
bug. If we don't match up our IOVs properly with the lenght we provide,
we could jump over the iov list into invalid memory in
_spdk_rw_iov_split_next.
Change-Id: I472a7aa53027af0a18ebeee8226e0b008447cce4
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424248
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
To be consistent with nvmf, use underscore.
Change-Id: I5f2ae60518367ab439db9b893ab8ba975e82bed9
Signed-off-by: Liang Yan <liang.z.yan@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424179
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
This has been reduced to just a call to
spdk_bdev_io_complete(), so it is no longer needed.
While here, call spdk_bdev_io_complete() directly
in the strip-crossing error case as well.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ia949e3fd55b52e5c873bd591e541ecf6c0c086b1
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423327
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Now that I/O never span a strip boundary, we don't
need to count splits.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: Iea5df5ca055fe4b338fb5cb0828a45502c239458
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423325
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
This is in response to a Scan-build issue reported on Clang 6.
Change-Id: I2edc853145762998db818cbbe0e9ca0d9b8c123d
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424139
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Set the bdev->optimal_io_boundary to the strip size, and
set split_on_optimal_io_boundary = true. This will ensure
that all I/O submitted to the raid module do not cross
a strip boundary, meaning it does not need to be split
across multiple member disks.
This is a step towards removing the iovcnt == 1
limitation. Further improvements and simplifications
will be made in future patches before removing this
restriction.
Unit tests need to be adjusted here to not span
boundaries either.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I08943805def673288f552a1b7662a4fbe16f25eb
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423323
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Splitting a 1TB unmap into individual 64KB unmap commands
(for a RAID volume with 64KB strip size) would be awful -
the RAID module can be much smarter about this.
So back out the changes for splitting I/O without payload.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I24fe6d911f4e3c9db4b2cb5d66c7236a5596e0d9
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424103
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
This no longer requires special handling - the event can be
acknowledged like all of the others.
Change-Id: Ib30cf35ec7aff45734ca6fe729e15d8fe41e3838
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423935
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell5141@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Keep the code together. This is only code movement.
Change-Id: Ie52f1ab09e197192025f2b664df410ba6e1f06aa
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423934
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell5141@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Previously, this would release resources for requests if there
was an RDMA error on the qpair. Expand this case to include
scenarios where the qpair is in the process of intentionally
shutting down.
Change-Id: Ib018f190389ee2df20eba3dddcc7dcffdbb4909d
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423745
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell5141@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
This guarantees that the qpair memory still exists.
Change-Id: I759197b90513f30488aa46bd26535c663e64dae6
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423744
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell5141@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Don't abort commands in states indicating an RDMA operation
is outstanding until an event indicates that all of the
work items have completed.
Change-Id: Ie2b83604bee142e383ffbcae088f4da0fd0fa658
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423413
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell5141@gmail.com>
One was an API issue, another was a dereference of a null pointer that
resulted from a possible call to a stubbed function in the unittest
common code, and the last was an erroneous use-after-free due to
scan-build apparently not understanding TAILQ_REMOVE.
Change-Id: I9111817e9e990ff6e388351c08f34c2e945df62d
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423959
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
This removes assumptions about hte lifecycle of these variables relative
to the parent bdev and allows us to avoid ambiguity about who
is responsible for freeing these buffers.
Change-Id: Ia996653562d532fa1501faf21d3fdff85033ab33
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424105
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Next patch will keep RAID bdev without removal when adding any base
bdev to the RAID bdev fails for some reason for construct_raid_bdev
RPC.
The half-baked RAID bdev will become unnamed and this should be avoided.
Change-Id: I3ad0d58a04a7638b9b286babe0e56e057e7f5d0d
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423621
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
When check_and_remove_raid_bdev(raid_cfg) is called, raid_bdev
must be in configuring state. However, offline state will be
probable as well. Besides similar and more comprehensive state
check is done in raid_bdev_cleanup(). Hence remove this check.
Change-Id: I8526da51828f18a8393afbd3d81c0a52f2d33261
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423620
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
When a raid bdev is constructed by JSON-RPC construct_raid_bdev,
information about config and slot can be passed to
raid_bdev_add_base_device() and raid_bdev_can_claim() doesn't have
to be called.
Hence extract raid_bdev_can_claim_bdev() from raid_bdev_add_base_device()
and put it to raid_bdev_examine().
Change-Id: I92e02bf3661cb97b691246f32198ba946810d96c
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423618
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
When the name of raid bdev is already used by any existing bdev,
spdk_bdev_register() will fail. Hence checking if bdev is duplicated
can be left with spdk_bdev_register().
Change-Id: I22f0c75b0e87c5bd71ece383d146ec61cfaf2627
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423617
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
When raid_bdev_alloc_base_bdev_resource() is called through raid_bdev_examine(),
if raid_bdev_alloc_base_bdev_resource() fails, raid_bdev_cleanup() is called
without freeing base bdev resource.
There is no way to free base bdev resource in this case.
Hence remove cleanup call.
Change-Id: I93494502bfe653293825e11872de5883702e495a
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423616
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
