IB Architecture Specification vol.1 rel.13. in ch.10.3.1 "QUEUE PAIR
AND EE CONTEXT STATES" suggests the following destroy procedure for
QPs associated with SRQ:
- Put the QP in the Error State;
- wait for the Affiliated Asynchronous Last WQE Reached Event;
- either:
* drain the CQ by invoking the Poll CQ verb and either wait for CQ
to be empty or the number of Poll CQ operations has exceeded CQ
capacity size; or
* post another WR that completes on the same CQ and wait for this WR
to return as a WC;
- and then invoke a Destroy QP or Reset QP.
Without the drain step it is possible that LAST_WQE_REACHED event is
received and QP is destroyed before the last receive WR completion is
polled from the CQ.
In SPDK there is no risk of resource leakage in this case. So, instead
of draining we can destroy QP and then just ignore receive completions
without QP and post receive WRs back to SRQ.
Fixes#903
Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Kochetov <evgeniik@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Kotchubievsky <sashakot@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexey Marchuk <alexeymar@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/465747 (master)
(cherry picked from commit 87ebcb08c1)
Change-Id: Ice6d3d5afc205c489f768e3b51c6cda8809bee9a
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/468300
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eugene Kochetov <evgeniik@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
d53a1f1cba