The mdio driver interface is generally useful for devices that require
MDIO without the full MII bus interface. This lifts the driver/interface
out of etherswitch(4), and adds a mdio(4) man page.
Submitted by: Landon Fuller <landon@landonf.org>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D4606
IPv4/IPv6 checksum offloading and VLAN tag insertion/stripping.
Since uether doesn't provide a way to announce driver specific offload
capabilities to upper stack, checksum offloading support needs more work
and will be done in the future.
Special thanks to Hayes Wang from RealTek who gave input.
The mlx5* driver(s) are built [*]/installed separate from the OFED stack thanks
to recent refactoring done in the linuxkpi(4) module.
Always install the manpages instead of conditionally installing them if
MK_OFED != no
* Further refactoring of sys/ofed and linuxkpi(4) is pending to fully divorce
mlx5* from ofed headers
MFC after: never
Requested by: hps
default and add a manual page for mlx5en. The mlx5 module contains
shared code for both infiniband and ethernet. The mlx5en module
contains specific code for ethernet functionality only. A mlx5ib
module is in the works for infiniband support.
Supported hardware:
- ConnectX-4: 10/20/25/40/50/56/100Gb/s speeds.
- ConnectX-4 LX: 10/25/40/50Gb/s speeds (low power consumption)
Refer to the mlx5en(4) manual page for a comprehensive list.
The team porting the mlx5 driver(s) to FreeBSD:
- Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@freebsd.org>
- Oded Shanoon <odeds@mellanox.com>
- Meny Yossefi <menyy@mellanox.com>
- Shany Michaely <shanim@mellanox.com>
- Shahar Klein <shahark@mellanox.com>
- Daria Genzel <dariaz@mellanox.com>
- Mark Bloch <markb@mellanox.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D4163
Submitted by: Mark Block <markb@mellanox.com>
Sponsored by: Mellanox Technologies
Reviewed by: gnn @
MFC after: 3 days
- Move all section 5 bluetooth manpages under MK_BLUETOOTH != no
MFC after: 3 days
PR: 193260
Reported by: Philippe Michel <philippe.michel7@sfr.fr>
Sponsored by: EMC / Isilon Storage Division
MK_USB != no
Add the manpages to OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc
As a side-effect, this also fixes installworld with MK_USB == no
X-MFC with: r290128
Sponsored by: EMC / Isilon Storage Division
only gpiobus configured via FDT is supported. Bus enumeration is
supported. Devices are created for each device found. 1-Wire
temperature controllers are supported, but other drivers could be
written. Temperatures are polled and reported via a sysctl. Errors
are reported via sysctl counters. Mis-wired bus detection is included
for more trouble shooting. See ow(4), owc(4) and ow_temp(4) for
details of what's supported and known issues.
This has been tested on Raspberry Pi-B, Pi2 and Beagle Bone Black
with up to 7 devices.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2956
Relnotes: yes
MFC after: 2 weeks
Reviewed by: loos@ (with many insightful comments)
I/OAT is also referred to as Crystal Beach DMA and is a Platform Storage
Extension (PSE) on some Intel server platforms.
This driver currently supports DMA descriptors only and is part of a
larger effort to upstream an interconnect between multiple systems using
the Non-Transparent Bridge (NTB) PSE.
For now, this driver is only built on AMD64 platforms. It may be ported
to work on i386 later, if that is desired. The hardware is exclusive to
x86.
Further documentation on ioat(4), including API documentation and usage,
can be found in the new manual page.
Bring in a test tool, ioatcontrol(8), in tools/tools/ioat. The test
tool is not hooked up to the build and is not intended for end users.
Submitted by: jimharris, Carl Delsey <carl.r.delsey@intel.com>
Reviewed by: jimharris (reviewed my changes)
Approved by: markj (mentor)
Relnotes: yes
Sponsored by: Intel
Sponsored by: EMC / Isilon Storage Division
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3456
CloudABI has two separate kernel modules: cloudabi and cloudabi64. The
first module contains all the pointer size independent code, whereas
cloudabi64 contains the actual 64-bits specific system calls and the ELF
loader.
Reviewed by: wblock
Obtained from: https://github.com/NuxiNL/freebsd
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3258
This is based on work done by jeff@ and jhb@, as well as the numa.diff
patch that has been circulating when someone asks for first-touch NUMA
on -10 or -11.
* Introduce a simple set of VM policy and iterator types.
* tie the policy types into the vm_phys path for now, mirroring how
the initial first-touch allocation work was enabled.
* add syscalls to control changing thread and process defaults.
* add a global NUMA VM domain policy.
* implement a simple cascade policy order - if a thread policy exists, use it;
if a process policy exists, use it; use the default policy.
* processes inherit policies from their parent processes, threads inherit
policies from their parent threads.
* add a simple tool (numactl) to query and modify default thread/process
policities.
* add documentation for the new syscalls, for numa and for numactl.
* re-enable first touch NUMA again by default, as now policies can be
set in a variety of methods.
This is only relevant for very specific workloads.
This doesn't pretend to be a final NUMA solution.
The previous defaults in -HEAD (with MAXMEMDOM set) can be achieved by
'sysctl vm.default_policy=rr'.
This is only relevant if MAXMEMDOM is set to something other than 1.
Ie, if you're using GENERIC or a modified kernel with non-NUMA, then
this is a glorified no-op for you.
Thank you to Norse Corp for giving me access to rather large
(for FreeBSD!) NUMA machines in order to develop and verify this.
Thank you to Dell for providing me with dual socket sandybridge
and westmere v3 hardware to do NUMA development with.
Thank you to Scott Long at Netflix for providing me with access
to the two-socket, four-domain haswell v3 hardware.
Thank you to Peter Holm for running the stress testing suite
against the NUMA branch during various stages of development!
Tested:
* MIPS (regression testing; non-NUMA)
* i386 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC)
* amd64 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC)
* westmere, 2 socket (thankyou norse!)
* sandy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou dell!)
* ivy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou norse!)
* westmere-EX, 4 socket / 1TB RAM (thankyou norse!)
* haswell, 2 socket (thankyou norse!)
* haswell v3, 2 socket (thankyou dell)
* haswell v3, 2x18 core (thankyou scott long / netflix!)
* Peter Holm ran a stress test suite on this work and found one
issue, but has not been able to verify it (it doesn't look NUMA
related, and he only saw it once over many testing runs.)
* I've tested bhyve instances running in fixed NUMA domains and cpusets;
all seems to work correctly.
Verified:
* intel-pcm - pcm-numa.x and pcm-memory.x, whilst selecting different
NUMA policies for processes under test.
Review:
This was reviewed through phabricator (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2559)
as well as privately and via emails to freebsd-arch@. The git history
with specific attributes is available at https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/
in the NUMA branch (https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/compare/local/adrian_numa_policy).
This has been reviewed by a number of people (stas, rpaulo, kib, ngie,
wblock) but not achieved a clear consensus. My hope is that with further
exposure and testing more functionality can be implemented and evaluated.
Notes:
* The VM doesn't handle unbalanced domains very well, and if you have an overly
unbalanced memory setup whilst under high memory pressure, VM page allocation
may fail leading to a kernel panic. This was a problem in the past, but it's
much more easily triggered now with these tools.
* This work only controls the path through vm_phys; it doesn't yet strongly/predictably
affect contigmalloc, KVA placement, UMA, etc. So, driver placement of memory
isn't really guaranteed in any way. That's next on my plate.
Sponsored by: Norse Corp, Inc.; Dell
The format of these pages is somewhat experimental, so they may be subject
to further tweaking.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2170
Reviewed by: bcr, rpaulo
MFC after: 2 weeks
Many thanks to ian who gently provided me the DS1307 breakout board.
Tested on: Raspberry pi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2022
Reviewed by: rpaulo
has been removed and the driver has been greatly simplified and
optimised for FreeBSD. The driver is currently not built by default.
Requested by: Bruce Simpson <bms@fastmail.net>
DCTCP congestion control algorithm aims to maximise throughput and minimise
latency in data center networks by utilising the proportion of Explicit
Congestion Notification (ECN) marked packets received from capable hardware as a
congestion signal.
Highlights:
Implemented as a mod_cc(4) module.
ECN (Explicit congestion notification) processing is done differently from
RFC3168.
Takes one-sided DCTCP into consideration where only one of the sides is using
DCTCP and other is using standard ECN.
IETF draft: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bensley-tcpm-dctcp-00
Thesis report by Midori Kato: https://eggert.org/students/kato-thesis.pdf
Submitted by: Midori Kato <katoon@sfc.wide.ad.jp> and
Lars Eggert <lars@netapp.com>
with help and modifications from
hiren
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D604
Reviewed by: gnn
roughly 10 years, and the driver has not enjoyed any significant maintenance
since long before that. Despite well-meaning efforts from a number of
people, myself included, it never made the jump to 64-bit and was relegated
to the back-corners of i386. Now its frailty is hampering forward progress
with Clang. Any renewed engineering efforts are of course welcome and can
happen outside of the tree. No MFC of this is planned.
- bootparamd
- bootpd
- finger/fingerd
- ftp/ftpd
- hastctl/hastd
- iscsid, et al
- rbootd
- talk/talkd
- tcpd, et al
- tftp/tftpd
Add src.conf entries for the various components and do a best effort
at adding components to tools/build/mk/OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc
have chosen different (and more traditional) stateless/statuful
NAT64 as translation mechanism. Last non-trivial commits to both
faith(4) and faithd(8) happened more than 12 years ago, so I assume
it is time to drop RFC3142 in FreeBSD.
No objections from: net@
Split it into two modules: if_gre(4) for GRE encapsulation and
if_me(4) for minimal encapsulation within IP.
gre(4) changes:
* convert to if_transmit;
* rework locking: protect access to softc with rmlock,
protect from concurrent ioctls with sx lock;
* correct interface accounting for outgoing datagramms (count only payload size);
* implement generic support for using IPv6 as delivery header;
* make implementation conform to the RFC 2784 and partially to RFC 2890;
* add support for GRE checksums - calculate for outgoing datagramms and check
for inconming datagramms;
* add support for sending sequence number in GRE header;
* remove support of cached routes. This fixes problem, when gre(4) doesn't
work at system startup. But this also removes support for having tunnels with
the same addresses for inner and outer header.
* deprecate support for various GREXXX ioctls, that doesn't used in FreeBSD.
Use our standard ioctls for tunnels.
me(4):
* implementation conform to RFC 2004;
* use if_transmit;
* use the same locking model as gre(4);
PR: 164475
Differential Revision: D1023
No objections from: net@
Relnotes: yes
Sponsored by: Yandex LLC
Support for the multiport feature is mostly implemented, but currently
disabled due to some potential races in the hot plug code paths.
Requested by: marcel
MFC after: 1 month
Relnotes: yes
vxlan creates a virtual LAN by encapsulating the inner Ethernet frame in
a UDP packet. This implementation is based on RFC7348.
Currently, the IPv6 support is not fully compliant with the specification:
we should be able to receive UPDv6 packets with a zero checksum, but we
need to support RFC6935 first. Patches for this should come soon.
Encapsulation protocols such as vxlan emphasize the need for the FreeBSD
network stack to support batching, GRO, and GSO. Each frame has to make
two trips through the network stack, and each frame will be at most MTU
sized. Performance suffers accordingly.
Some latest generation NICs have begun to support vxlan HW offloads that
we should also take advantage of. VIMAGE support should also be added soon.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D384
Reviewed by: gnn
Relnotes: yes
