It is required by llvm-profdata, now built by default under the
LLVM_COV knob. The additional complexity that would come from avoiding
building it if CLANG_EXTRAS and LLVM_COV are both disabled is not worth
the small savings in build time.
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
from 12.0-ALPHA10 to 13.0-CURRENT. This edit was a mistake,
and should have been applied to stable/12 upon branching, not
head.
Reported by: jbeich, dim
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
ELF spec says that for SHT_REL and SHT_RELA sh_link should reference the
associated string table and sh_info should reference the "section to
which the relocation applies." ELF Tool Chain's elfcopy / strip use
this (in part) to control whether or not the relocation entry is copied
to the output.
LLVM PR 37538 https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37538
Approved by: re (kib)
Obtained from: llvm r344226 (backported for 6.0)
Previously Clang required ifunc resolution functions to take no
arguments, presumably because GCC documented ifunc resolvers as taking
no arguments. However, GCC accepts resolvers accepting arguments, and
our rtld passes CPU ID information (cpuid, hwcap, etc.) to ifunc
resolvers. Just remove the check from the in-tree compiler for our in-
tree compiler; a different (per-OS) approach may be required upstream.
Reported by: mjg
Approved by: re (rgrimes)
MFC after: 1 week
Relnotes: Yes
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
BPF (eBPF) is an independent instruction set architecture which is
introduced in Linux a few years ago. Originally, eBPF execute
environment was only inside Linux kernel. However, recent years there
are some user space implementation (https://github.com/iovisor/ubpf,
https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/prog_guide/bpf_lib.html) and kernel space
implementation for FreeBSD is going on
(https://github.com/YutaroHayakawa/generic-ebpf).
The BPF target support can be enabled using WITH_LLVM_TARGET_BPF, as it
is not built by default.
Submitted by: Yutaro Hayakawa <yhayakawa3720@gmail.com>
Reviewed by: dim, bdrewery
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D16033
All supported FreeBSD build host versions have backtrace.h, so we can
just eliminate that test. For futimes() we can test the compiler's
built-in __FreeBSD__ major version rather than relying on including
osreldate.h. This should reduce the frequency with which Clang gets
rebuilt when building world.
Reviewed by: dim
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
This effectively reverts r335449 and changes the previous MK_LLD_IS_LD
to a MK_LLD_BOOTSTRAP check. If !TOOLS_PREFIX then these sources are
always built for llvm-objdump, lld, and llvm-cov. When TOOLS_PREFIX
is set then they are only needed if lld is being bootstrapped.
Reported by: dim
Pointyhat to: bdrewery
Sponsored by: Dell EMC
This makes it possible, through src.conf(5) settings, to select which
LLVM targets you want to build during buildworld. The current list is:
* (WITH|WITHOUT)_LLVM_TARGET_AARCH64
* (WITH|WITHOUT)_LLVM_TARGET_ARM
* (WITH|WITHOUT)_LLVM_TARGET_MIPS
* (WITH|WITHOUT)_LLVM_TARGET_POWERPC
* (WITH|WITHOUT)_LLVM_TARGET_SPARC
* (WITH|WITHOUT)_LLVM_TARGET_X86
To not influence anything right now, all of these are on by default, in
situations where clang is enabled.
Selectively turning a few targets off manually should work. Turning on
only one target should work too, even if that target does not correspond
to the build architecture. (In that case, LLVM_NATIVE_ARCH will not be
defined, and you can only use the resulting clang executable for
cross-compiling.)
I performed a few measurements on one of the FreeBSD.org reference
machines, building clang from scratch, with all targets enabled, and
with only the x86 target enabled. The latter was ~12% faster in real
time (on a 32-core box), and ~14% faster in user time. For a full
buildworld the difference will probably be less pronounced, though.
Reviewed by: bdrewery
MFC after: 1 week
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D11077
lld always needs these DWARF sources, as well as other default and extra
tools. XDL seems to be the best fit list.
Remove MK_LLD_IS_LD check from SRCS_MIW which is now reduced to just a
few files for llvm-objdump.
Sponsored by: Dell EMC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D15915
MK_LLD is for the installed lld while MK_LLD_BOOTSTRAP is for the build
tool. For WITH_SYSTEM_LINKER it is necesarry to separate the logic of
these two. When building libllvm TOOLS_PREFIX will be defined and
MK_LLD_BOOTSTRAP should be checked instead.
Sponsored by: Dell EMC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D15837
A non-alloc note section should not have a PT_NOTE program header.
Found while linking ghc (Haskell compiler) with lld on FreeBSD. Haskell
emits a .debug-ghc-link-info note section (as the name suggests, it
contains link info) as a SHT_NOTE section without SHF_ALLOC set.
For this case ld.bfd does not emit a PT_NOTE segment for
.debug-ghc-link-info. lld previously emitted a PT_NOTE with p_vaddr = 0
and FreeBSD's rtld segfaulted when trying to parse a note at address 0.
LLVM PR: https://llvm.org/pr37361
LLVM review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46623
PR: 226872
Reviewed by: dim
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
EFLAGS copy that lives out of a basic block!" errors on i386.
Pull in r325446 from upstream clang trunk (by me):
[X86] Add 'sahf' CPU feature to frontend
Summary:
Make clang accept `-msahf` (and `-mno-sahf`) flags to activate the
`+sahf` feature for the backend, for bug 36028 (Incorrect use of
pushf/popf enables/disables interrupts on amd64 kernels). This was
originally submitted in bug 36037 by Jonathan Looney
<jonlooney@gmail.com>.
As described there, GCC also uses `-msahf` for this feature, and the
backend already recognizes the `+sahf` feature. All that is needed is
to teach clang to pass this on to the backend.
The mapping of feature support onto CPUs may not be complete; rather,
it was chosen to match LLVM's idea of which CPUs support this feature
(see lib/Target/X86/X86.td).
I also updated the affected test case (CodeGen/attr-target-x86.c) to
match the emitted output.
Reviewers: craig.topper, coby, efriedma, rsmith
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: emaste, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43394
Pull in r328944 from upstream llvm trunk (by Chandler Carruth):
[x86] Expose more of the condition conversion routines in the public
API for X86's instruction information. I've now got a second patch
under review that needs these same APIs. This bit is nicely
orthogonal and obvious, so landing it. NFC.
Pull in r329414 from upstream llvm trunk (by Craig Topper):
[X86] Merge itineraries for CLC, CMC, and STC.
These are very simple flag setting instructions that appear to only
be a single uop. They're unlikely to need this separation.
Pull in r329657 from upstream llvm trunk (by Chandler Carruth):
[x86] Introduce a pass to begin more systematically fixing PR36028
and similar issues.
The key idea is to lower COPY nodes populating EFLAGS by scanning the
uses of EFLAGS and introducing dedicated code to preserve the
necessary state in a GPR. In the vast majority of cases, these uses
are cmovCC and jCC instructions. For such cases, we can very easily
save and restore the necessary information by simply inserting a
setCC into a GPR where the original flags are live, and then testing
that GPR directly to feed the cmov or conditional branch.
However, things are a bit more tricky if arithmetic is using the
flags. This patch handles the vast majority of cases that seem to
come up in practice: adc, adcx, adox, rcl, and rcr; all without
taking advantage of partially preserved EFLAGS as LLVM doesn't
currently model that at all.
There are a large number of operations that techinaclly observe
EFLAGS currently but shouldn't in this case -- they typically are
using DF. Currently, they will not be handled by this approach.
However, I have never seen this issue come up in practice. It is
already pretty rare to have these patterns come up in practical code
with LLVM. I had to resort to writing MIR tests to cover most of the
logic in this pass already. I suspect even with its current amount
of coverage of arithmetic users of EFLAGS it will be a significant
improvement over the current use of pushf/popf. It will also produce
substantially faster code in most of the common patterns.
This patch also removes all of the old lowering for EFLAGS copies,
and the hack that forced us to use a frame pointer when EFLAGS copies
were found anywhere in a function so that the dynamic stack
adjustment wasn't a problem. None of this is needed as we now lower
all of these copies directly in MI and without require stack
adjustments.
Lots of thanks to Reid who came up with several aspects of this
approach, and Craig who helped me work out a couple of things
tripping me up while working on this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45146
Pull in r329673 from upstream llvm trunk (by Chandler Carruth):
[x86] Model the direction flag (DF) separately from the rest of
EFLAGS.
This cleans up a number of operations that only claimed te use EFLAGS
due to using DF. But no instructions which we think of us setting
EFLAGS actually modify DF (other than things like popf) and so this
needlessly creates uses of EFLAGS that aren't really there.
In fact, DF is so restrictive it is pretty easy to model. Only STD,
CLD, and the whole-flags writes (WRFLAGS and POPF) need to model
this.
I've also somewhat cleaned up some of the flag management instruction
definitions to be in the correct .td file.
Adding this extra register also uncovered a failure to use the
correct datatype to hold X86 registers, and I've corrected that as
necessary here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45154
Pull in r330264 from upstream llvm trunk (by Chandler Carruth):
[x86] Fix PR37100 by teaching the EFLAGS copy lowering to rewrite
uses across basic blocks in the limited cases where it is very
straight forward to do so.
This will also be useful for other places where we do some limited
EFLAGS propagation across CFG edges and need to handle copy rewrites
afterward. I think this is rapidly approaching the maximum we can and
should be doing here. Everything else begins to require either heroic
analysis to prove how to do PHI insertion manually, or somehow
managing arbitrary PHI-ing of EFLAGS with general PHI insertion.
Neither of these seem at all promising so if those cases come up,
we'll almost certainly need to rewrite the parts of LLVM that produce
those patterns.
We do now require dominator trees in order to reliably diagnose
patterns that would require PHI nodes. This is a bit unfortunate but
it seems better than the completely mysterious crash we would get
otherwise.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45673
Together, these should ensure clang does not use pushf/popf sequences to
save and restore flags, avoiding problems with unrelated flags (such as
the interrupt flag) being restored unexpectedly.
Requested by: jtl
PR: 225330
MFC after: 1 week
This will faciliate a WITH_SYSTEM_LINKER option.
Reviewed by: dim
MFC after: 1 week
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D15110
[X86] Add 'sahf' CPU feature to frontend
Summary:
Make clang accept `-msahf` (and `-mno-sahf`) flags to activate the
`+sahf` feature for the backend, for bug 36028 (Incorrect use of
pushf/popf enables/disables interrupts on amd64 kernels). This was
originally submitted in bug 36037 by Jonathan Looney
<jonlooney@gmail.com>.
As described there, GCC also uses `-msahf` for this feature, and the
backend already recognizes the `+sahf` feature. All that is needed is
to teach clang to pass this on to the backend.
The mapping of feature support onto CPUs may not be complete; rather,
it was chosen to match LLVM's idea of which CPUs support this feature
(see lib/Target/X86/X86.td).
I also updated the affected test case (CodeGen/attr-target-x86.c) to
match the emitted output.
Reviewers: craig.topper, coby, efriedma, rsmith
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: emaste, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43394
Pull in r328944 from upstream llvm trunk (by Chandler Carruth):
[x86] Expose more of the condition conversion routines in the public
API for X86's instruction information. I've now got a second patch
under review that needs these same APIs. This bit is nicely
orthogonal and obvious, so landing it. NFC.
Pull in r329414 from upstream llvm trunk (by Craig Topper):
[X86] Merge itineraries for CLC, CMC, and STC.
These are very simple flag setting instructions that appear to only
be a single uop. They're unlikely to need this separation.
Pull in r329657 from upstream llvm trunk (by Chandler Carruth):
[x86] Introduce a pass to begin more systematically fixing PR36028
and similar issues.
The key idea is to lower COPY nodes populating EFLAGS by scanning the
uses of EFLAGS and introducing dedicated code to preserve the
necessary state in a GPR. In the vast majority of cases, these uses
are cmovCC and jCC instructions. For such cases, we can very easily
save and restore the necessary information by simply inserting a
setCC into a GPR where the original flags are live, and then testing
that GPR directly to feed the cmov or conditional branch.
However, things are a bit more tricky if arithmetic is using the
flags. This patch handles the vast majority of cases that seem to
come up in practice: adc, adcx, adox, rcl, and rcr; all without
taking advantage of partially preserved EFLAGS as LLVM doesn't
currently model that at all.
There are a large number of operations that techinaclly observe
EFLAGS currently but shouldn't in this case -- they typically are
using DF. Currently, they will not be handled by this approach.
However, I have never seen this issue come up in practice. It is
already pretty rare to have these patterns come up in practical code
with LLVM. I had to resort to writing MIR tests to cover most of the
logic in this pass already. I suspect even with its current amount
of coverage of arithmetic users of EFLAGS it will be a significant
improvement over the current use of pushf/popf. It will also produce
substantially faster code in most of the common patterns.
This patch also removes all of the old lowering for EFLAGS copies,
and the hack that forced us to use a frame pointer when EFLAGS copies
were found anywhere in a function so that the dynamic stack
adjustment wasn't a problem. None of this is needed as we now lower
all of these copies directly in MI and without require stack
adjustments.
Lots of thanks to Reid who came up with several aspects of this
approach, and Craig who helped me work out a couple of things
tripping me up while working on this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45146
Pull in r329673 from upstream llvm trunk (by Chandler Carruth):
[x86] Model the direction flag (DF) separately from the rest of
EFLAGS.
This cleans up a number of operations that only claimed te use EFLAGS
due to using DF. But no instructions which we think of us setting
EFLAGS actually modify DF (other than things like popf) and so this
needlessly creates uses of EFLAGS that aren't really there.
In fact, DF is so restrictive it is pretty easy to model. Only STD,
CLD, and the whole-flags writes (WRFLAGS and POPF) need to model
this.
I've also somewhat cleaned up some of the flag management instruction
definitions to be in the correct .td file.
Adding this extra register also uncovered a failure to use the
correct datatype to hold X86 registers, and I've corrected that as
necessary here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45154
Together, these should ensure clang does not use pushf/popf sequences to
save and restore flags, avoiding problems with unrelated flags (such as
the interrupt flag) being restored unexpectedly.
Requested by: jtl
PR: 225330
MFC after: 1 week
Introduce WITH_/WITHOUT_LLVM_COV to match GCC's WITH_/WITHOUT_GCOV.
It is intended to provide a superset of the interface and functionality
of gcov.
It is enabled by default when building Clang, similarly to gcov and GCC.
This change moves one file in libllvm to be compiled unconditionally.
Previously it was included only when WITH_CLANG_EXTRAS was set, but the
complexity of a new special case for (CLANG_EXTRAS | LLVM_COV) is not
worth avoiding a tiny increase in build time.
Reviewed by: dim, imp
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D142645
