in the code enforces this. So, do not check for and attempt a
false reassembly if only IP_RF is set.
Also, removed the dead code, since we no longer use dtom() on
return from ip_reass().
and stg drivers. Also all config indexes for these cards are changed
to auto.
Note, still if you would like to use cards which has a comment;
# (Do not put this entry under Bustoaster)
you need some quick hack. Uncomment the entry above.
Reviewed by: sanpei@FreeBSD.org
DM9100/DM9102 chips. Do not set DC_TX_ONE. The DC_TX_USE_TX_INTR flag
causes dc_encap() to set the 'interrupt on TX completion' bit only
once every 64 packets. This is an attempt to reduce the number
of interrupts generated by the chip. You're supposed to get a 'no more
TX buffers left' interrupt once you hit the last packet whether you
ask for one or not, however it seems the Davicom chip doesn't generate
this interrupt, or at least it doesn't generate it under the same
circumstances. The result is that if you transmit n packets, where
n is less than 64, and then wait 5 seconds, you'll get a watchdog
timeout whether you want one or not. The DC_TX_INTR_ALWAYS causes
dc_encap() to request an interrupt for every frame.
I'm still waiting on confirmation from a couple of users to see if this
fixes their problems with the Davicom DM9102 before I merge this into
-stable, but this fixed the problem for me in my own testing so I'm
willing to make the change to -current right away.
expands beyond the limit we will extend the address space before trying
to zero the BSS. This should give us plenty of headroom for modest
expansion of the loader.
- Change the softintr() macro to do nothing on FreeBSD. Previously,
this macro would set a bit in spending and schedule the softinterrupt
thread to run. However, the bs driver never actually registers a
a software interrupt handler, so all this work achieved nothing. From
the code it is not clear what exactly the softintr() macro is actually
supposed to be doing. It looks like it is supposed to be possibly
running the hardware interrupt handler maybe? This handler is only
present in the #ifdef __NetBSD__ code however. I have no idea how this
driver handles interrupts at all, but at least it compiles now.
by sigwait(). This prevents a signal from being sent to the process
when there are no application installed signal handlers.
Correct a typo in sigwait (foo -> foo[i]).
