I have held this back for over a year, as we will always have to wrestle
with the question of "*which* libiberty sources to use". Sigh, if only
the GNU people would treat it as a totally separate library from GCC, et al.
and release it as such...
"locailzed"; it should read "localized".
* The "test" operator can be a bit dangerous (e.g., if
a newbie writes a script named "test" and has it call
"apropos", which calls "test, ...).
* In its use as "whatis", apropos formats the first
line of the output differently than the following
lines. Specifically, it leaves out all but one of
the spaces that precede the dash in the first line.
Submitted by: Rich Morin <rdm@cfcl.com>
PR: 25126
out of sync. A similar change was made by itojun on the OpenBSD tree
a few weeks ago. This should stop people disabling one server and
forgetting the other one (eg: ftp and/or telnet)
Make sure we pass $(BUILDOPTS) to the `clean' target
so that `make clean' works on the same set of object
files. Otherwise, we may end up with an incorrectly
built and up-to-date object file.
Consider this /etc/fstab:
# Device Mountpoint FStype Options Dump Pass#
/dev/ad1s1b none swap sw 0 0
/dev/ad0s1b none swap sw 0 0
/dev/ad0s1a / ufs rw 1 1
/dev/ad0s1e /home ufs rw 2 2
/dev/ad1s1e /tmp ufs rw 2 2
/dev/ad1s1f /usr ufs rw 2 2
/dev/ccd0c /syv ufs rw 2 11
proc /proc procfs rw 0 0
ccd0c is striped over /dev/ad0f and /dev/ad1g
Without this pass, fsck in preen mode will check ad0s1a first,
and then issue three processes in parallel:
One process doing ad0s1e
One process doing ad1s1e and ad1s1f
One process doing ccd0c
There is no way to tell it that ccd0c overlaps ad0 and ad1.
With the patch, it will do it this way:
pass 2:
One process doing ad0s1e
One process doing ad1s1e and ad1s1f
and when they are complete:
pass 11:
One process doing ccd0c
This is much faster and more sane.
Valid pass numbers are anything from 1 to INTMAX-1.
I retired the '-l' option which tried to allow people to do
something like this, but which didn't work and which complicated
the code an awful lot.
ps_showallprocs such that if superuser is present to override process
hiding, the search falls through [to success]. When additional
restrictions are placed on process visibility, such as MAC, new clauses
will be placed above the return(0).
Obtained from: TrustedBSD Project
than a NOP. bounds_check_with_label() would return -1 yet NOT set any
of the bio flags to show an error. This meant the caller would not
properly see that bounds_check_with_label() did not do any work. This
prevented newfs(8) from being able to write a file system on any partition
other than `c' on a `ccd'.
The logs of this file do not tell _why_ bounds_check_with_label() was
emasculated. Nor are there any `XXX' comments. So we'll unemasculated
it, and see what breaks.
Submitted by: gallatin
a #defined constant, wrap a few long lines, etc... Also remove stupid
'all your base are belong to us' joke from comment that I don't really
care to see immortalized in the source tree.
- Added 4 speaker enable to initialization sequence.
- Removed delays between register pokes which appear to aggravate a
problem this card has sampling at 44.1kHz. With any form of delay,
skew relative to system clock at 44.1kHz is usually in range 0-25%
(now 0-3%). No other rates exhibit this problem.
- Changed structs cmi_* to sc_*.
Approved by: Cameron Grant <gandalf@vilnya.demon.co.uk>
NO_MAKEDEV_INSTALL and NO_MAKEDEV_RUN. The former implying the latter.
The names imply what they do. The last commit by DES based on a PR defeated
the original idea behind NO_MAKEDEV, which was not to run MAKEDEV, but to do
the installation of MAKEDEV. This should satisfy both parties on the MAKEDEV
challenge.
Reflect this in mergemaster, this might later on be decided to be set to
NO_MAKEDEV_INSTALL, for now I kept to the old behaviour.
NO_MAKEDEV_INSTALL and NO_MAKEDEV_RUN. The former implying the latter.
The names imply what they do. The last commit by DES based on a PR defeated
the original idea behind NO_MAKEDEV, which was not to run MAKEDEV, but to do
the installation of MAKEDEV. This should satisfy both parties on the MAKEDEV
challenge.
Reflect this in the documentation.
NO_MAKEDEV_INSTALL and NO_MAKEDEV_RUN. The former implying the latter.
The names imply what they do. The last commit by DES based on a PR defeated
the original idea behind NO_MAKEDEV, which was not to run MAKEDEV, but to do
the installation of MAKEDEV. This should satisfy both parties on the MAKEDEV
challenge.
<sys/mutex.h> due to #include spam in <sys/mutex.h>. (More precisely,
<sys/time.h> is the prerequisite, but that is provided by standard
#include spam in <sys/param.h>.)
Fixed bitrot in prototype for mtx_init().
