lldb prepends the thread name to log entries, and the existing thread
name for the FreeBSD ProcessMonitor thread was longer than the kernel's
supported thread name length, and so was truncated. This made logs hard
to read, as the truncated thread name ran into the log message. Shorten
"lldb.process.freebsd.operation" to just "freebsd.op" so that logs are
more readable.
(Upstreaming to lldb still to be done).
This is a backport of LLVM commit 8331f61a51a7a0a1efbf5ed398e181593023d151,
llvm-svn: 353981:
ELF: Allow GOT relocs pointing to non-preemptable ifunc to resolve to an
IRELATIVE where possible.
This is needed in order to make ifuncs work correctly on PPC64.
It fixes an issue with lld, in which it would skip emitting necessary IRELATIVE
relocations. Without this change, indirect calls to ifuncs would result in a
segmentation fault, in static binaries or when defined in the main binary
(outside shared libraries).
This change also reverts the local
"Preserve relocations against ifuncs when -zifunc-noplt" commit and
replaces it by its upstream version, as part of the merge.
Reviewed by: markj
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21102
[CodeGen][NFC] Simplify checks for stack protector index checking
Use `hasStackProtectorIndex()` instead of `getStackProtectorIndex()
>= 0`.
Pull in r366371 from upstream llvm trunk (by Francis Visoiu Mistrih):
[PEI] Don't re-allocate a pre-allocated stack protector slot
The LocalStackSlotPass pre-allocates a stack protector and makes sure
that it comes before the local variables on the stack.
We need to make sure that later during PEI we don't re-allocate a new
stack protector slot. If that happens, the new stack protector slot
will end up being **after** the local variables that it should be
protecting.
Therefore, we would have two slots assigned for two different stack
protectors, one at the top of the stack, and one at the bottom. Since
PEI will overwrite the assigned slot for the stack protector, the
load that is used to compare the value of the stack protector will
use the slot assigned by PEI, which is wrong.
For this, we need to check if the object is pre-allocated, and re-use
that pre-allocated slot.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64757
Pull in r367068 from upstream llvm trunk (by Francis Visoiu Mistrih):
[CodeGen] Don't resolve the stack protector frame accesses until PEI
Currently, stack protector loads and stores are resolved during
LocalStackSlotAllocation (if the pass needs to run). When this is the
case, the base register assigned to the frame access is going to be
one of the vregs created during LocalStackSlotAllocation. This means
that we are keeping a pointer to the stack protector slot, and we're
using this pointer to load and store to it.
In case register pressure goes up, we may end up spilling this
pointer to the stack, which can be a security concern.
Instead, leave it to PEI to resolve the frame accesses. In order to
do that, we make all stack protector accesses go through frame index
operands, then PEI will resolve this using an offset from sp/fp/bp.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64759
Together, these fix a issue where the stack protection feature in LLVM's
ARM backend can be rendered ineffective when the stack protector slot is
re-allocated so that it appears after the local variables that it is
meant to protect, leaving the function potentially vulnerable to a
stack-based buffer overflow.
Reported by: andrew
Security: https://kb.cert.org/vuls/id/129209/
MFC after: 3 days
8.0.1 final release r366581. The only functional change is a fix for a
mismerge of upstream r360816, which properly restores the r2 register
when unwinding on PowerPC64 (See https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20337).
Relnotes: yes
PR: 236062
MFC after: 3 days
X-MFC-With: r349004
[ELF] Handle non-glob patterns before glob patterns in version
scripts & fix a corner case of --dynamic-list
This fixes PR38549, which is silently accepted by ld.bfd.
This seems correct because it makes sense to let non-glob patterns
take precedence over glob patterns.
lld issues an error because
`assignWildcardVersion(ver, VER_NDX_LOCAL);` is processed before
`assignExactVersion(ver, v.id, v.name);`.
Move all assignWildcardVersion() calls after assignExactVersion()
calls to fix this.
Also, move handleDynamicList() to the bottom. computeBinding() called
by includeInDynsym() has this cryptic rule:
if (versionId == VER_NDX_LOCAL && isDefined() && !isPreemptible)
return STB_LOCAL;
Before the change:
* foo's version is set to VER_NDX_LOCAL due to `local: *`
* handleDynamicList() is called
- foo.computeBinding() is STB_LOCAL
- foo.includeInDynsym() is false
- foo.isPreemptible is not set (wrong)
* foo's version is set to V1
After the change:
* foo's version is set to VER_NDX_LOCAL due to `local: *`
* foo's version is set to V1
* handleDynamicList() is called
- foo.computeBinding() is STB_GLOBAL
- foo.includeInDynsym() is true
- foo.isPreemptible is set (correct)
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64550
This makes it longer necessary to patch the version scripts for the
samba ports, to avoid "duplicate symbol 'pdb_search_init' in version
script" errors.
PR: 230602
MFC after: 3 days
3.4.1, which is still in the stable/10 branch.
It looks like clang 3.4.1 implements static_asserts by instantiating a
temporary static object, and if those are in an anonymous union, it
results in "error: anonymous union can only contain non-static data
members".
To work around this implementation limitation, move the static_asserts
in question out of the anonymous unions.
This should make building the latest stable/11 from stable/10 possible
again.
Reported by: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
MFC after: 3 days
libunwind and openmp to the upstream release_80 branch r364487
(effectively, 8.0.1 rc3). The 8.0.1 release will most likely
have no further changes.
MFC after: 1 week
X-MFC-With: r349004
Clarify comments on helpers used by LFTR [NFC]
I'm slowly wrapping my head around this code, and am making comment
improvements where I can.
Pull in r360972 from upstream llvm trunk (by Philip Reames):
[LFTR] Factor out a helper function for readability purpose [NFC]
Pull in r360976 from upstream llvm trunk (by Philip Reames):
[IndVars] Don't reimplement Loop::isLoopInvariant [NFC]
Using dominance vs a set membership check is indistinguishable from a
compile time perspective, and the two queries return equivelent
results. Simplify code by using the existing function.
Pull in r360978 from upstream llvm trunk (by Philip Reames):
[LFTR] Strengthen assertions in genLoopLimit [NFCI]
Pull in r362292 from upstream llvm trunk (by Nikita Popov):
[IndVarSimplify] Fixup nowrap flags during LFTR (PR31181)
Fix for https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31181 and partial fix
for LFTR poison handling issues in general.
When LFTR moves a condition from pre-inc to post-inc, it may now
depend on value that is poison due to nowrap flags. To avoid this, we
clear any nowrap flag that SCEV cannot prove for the post-inc addrec.
Additionally, LFTR may switch to a different IV that is dynamically
dead and as such may be arbitrarily poison. This patch will correct
nowrap flags in some but not all cases where this happens. This is
related to the adoption of IR nowrap flags for the pre-inc addrec.
(See some of the switch_to_different_iv tests, where flags are not
dropped or insufficiently dropped.)
Finally, there are likely similar issues with the handling of GEP
inbounds, but we don't have a test case for this yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60935
Pull in r362971 from upstream llvm trunk (by Philip Reames):
Prepare for multi-exit LFTR [NFC]
This change does the plumbing to wire an ExitingBB parameter through
the LFTR implementation, and reorganizes the code to work in terms of
a set of individual loop exits. Most of it is fairly obvious, but
there's one key complexity which makes it worthy of consideration.
The actual multi-exit LFTR patch is in D62625 for context.
Specifically, it turns out the existing code uses the backedge taken
count from before a IV is widened. Oddly, we can end up with a
different (more expensive, but semantically equivelent) BE count for
the loop when requerying after widening. For the nestedIV example
from elim-extend, we end up with the following BE counts:
BEFORE: (-2 + (-1 * %innercount) + %limit)
AFTER: (-1 + (sext i32 (-1 + %limit) to i64) + (-1 * (sext i32 %innercount to i64))<nsw>)
This is the only test in tree which seems sensitive to this
difference. The actual result of using the wider BETC on this example
is that we actually produce slightly better code. :)
In review, we decided to accept that test change. This patch is
structured to preserve the old behavior, but a separate change will
immediate follow with the behavior change. (I wanted it separate for
problem attribution purposes.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62880
Pull in r362975 from upstream llvm trunk (by Philip Reames):
[LFTR] Use recomputed BE count
This was discussed as part of D62880. The basic thought is that
computing BE taken count after widening should produce (on average)
an equally good backedge taken count as the one before widening.
Since there's only one test in the suite which is impacted by this
change, and it's essentially equivelent codegen, that seems to be a
reasonable assertion. This change was separated from r362971 so that
if this turns out to be problematic, the triggering piece is obvious
and easily revertable.
For the nestedIV example from elim-extend.ll, we end up with the
following BE counts:
BEFORE: (-2 + (-1 * %innercount) + %limit)
AFTER: (-1 + (sext i32 (-1 + %limit) to i64) + (-1 * (sext i32 %innercount to i64))<nsw>)
Note that before is an i32 type, and the after is an i64. Truncating
the i64 produces the i32.
Pull in r362980 from upstream llvm trunk (by Philip Reames):
Factor out a helper function for readability and reuse in a future
patch [NFC]
Pull in r363613 from upstream llvm trunk (by Philip Reames):
Fix a bug w/inbounds invalidation in LFTR (recommit)
Recommit r363289 with a bug fix for crash identified in pr42279.
Issue was that a loop exit test does not have to be an icmp, leading
to a null dereference crash when new logic was exercised for that
case. Test case previously committed in r363601.
Original commit comment follows:
This contains fixes for two cases where we might invalidate inbounds
and leave it stale in the IR (a miscompile). Case 1 is when switching
to an IV with no dynamically live uses, and case 2 is when doing
pre-to-post conversion on the same pointer type IV.
The basic scheme used is to prove that using the given IV (pre or
post increment forms) would have to already trigger UB on the path to
the test we're modifying. As such, our potential UB triggering use
does not change the semantics of the original program.
As was pointed out in the review thread by Nikita, this is defending
against a separate issue from the hasConcreteDef case. This is about
poison, that's about undef. Unfortunately, the two are different, see
Nikita's comment for a fuller explanation, he explains it well.
(Note: I'm going to address Nikita's last style comment in a separate
commit just to minimize chance of subtle bugs being introduced due to
typos.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62939
Pull in r363875 from upstream llvm trunk (by Philip Reames):
[LFTR] Rename variable to minimize confusion [NFC]
(Recommit of r363293 which was reverted when a dependent patch was.)
As pointed out by Nikita in D62625, BackedgeTakenCount is generally
used to refer to the backedge taken count of the loop. A conditional
backedge taken count - one which only applies if a particular exit is
taken - is called a ExitCount in SCEV code, so be consistent here.
Pull in r363877 from upstream llvm trunk (by Philip Reames):
[LFTR] Stylistic cleanup as suggested in last review comment of
D62939 [NFC]
(Resumbit of r363292 which was reverted along w/an earlier patch)
Pull in r364346 from upstream llvm trunk (by Philip Reames):
[LFTR] Adjust debug output to include extensions (if any)
Pull in r364693 from upstream llvm trunk (by Philip Reames):
[IndVars] Remove a bit of manual constant folding [NFC]
SCEV is more than capable of folding (add x, trunc(0)) to x.
Pull in r364709 from upstream llvm trunk (by Nikita Popov):
[LFTR] Fix post-inc pointer IV with truncated exit count (PR41998)
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41998. Usually when we
have a truncated exit count we'll truncate the IV when comparing
against the limit, in which case exit count overflow in post-inc form
doesn't matter. However, for pointer IVs we don't do that, so we have
to be careful about incrementing the IV in the wide type.
I'm fixing this by removing the IVCount variable (which was ExitCount
or ExitCount+1) and replacing it with a UsePostInc flag, and then
moving the actual limit adjustment to the individual cases (which
are: pointer IV where we add to the wide type, integer IV where we
add to the narrow type, and constant integer IV where we add to the
wide type).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63686
Together, these should fix a hang when building the textproc/htmldoc
port, due to an incorrect loop optimization.
PR: 237515
MFC after: 1 week
Summary:
Toolchain follow-up to r349350. LLVM patches will be submitted upstream for
9.0 as well.
The bsd.cpu.mk change is required because GNU ld assumes BSS-PLT if it
cannot determine for certain that it needs Secure-PLT, and some binaries do
not compile in such a way to make it know to use Secure-PLT.
Reviewed By: nwhitehorn, bdragon, pfg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20598
libunwind and openmp to the upstream release_80 branch r363030
(effectively, 8.0.1 rc2). The 8.0.1 release should follow this within a
week or so.
MFC after: 2 weeks
[SelectionDAG] soften assertion when legalizing narrow vector FP ops
The test based on PR42010:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42010
...may show an inaccuracy for PPC's target defs, but we should not be
so aggressive with an assert here. There's no telling what
out-of-tree targets look like.
This fixes an assertion when building the graphics/mesa-dri port for
PowerPC64.
Reported by: Mark Millard <marklmi26-fbsd@yahoo.com>
PR: 238082
MFC after: 3 days
[ARM] Glue register copies to tail calls.
This generally follows what other targets do. I don't completely
understand why the special case for tail calls existed in the first
place; even when the code was committed in r105413, call lowering
didn't work in the way described in the comments.
Stack protector lowering breaks if the register copies are not glued
to a tail call: we have to insert the stack protector check before
the tail call, and we choose the location based on the assumption
that all physical register dependencies of a tail call are adjacent
to the tail call. (See FindSplitPointForStackProtector.) This is sort
of fragile, but I don't see any reason to break that assumption.
I'm guessing nobody has seen this before just because it's hard to
convince the scheduler to actually schedule the code in a way that
breaks; even without the glue, the only computation that could
actually be scheduled after the register copies is the computation of
the call address, and the scheduler usually prefers to schedule that
before the copies anyway.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41417
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60427
This should fix several instances of "Bad machine code: Using an
undefined physical register", when compiling ports such as
multimedia/vlc, audio/alsa-lib and devel/avro-c for armv6, with
-fstack-protector-strong.
Reported by: jbeich
PR: 237074, 237783, 237784
MFC after: 3 days
[objc-gnustep] Use .init_array not .ctors when requested.
This doesn't make a difference most of the time but FreeBSD/ARM
doesn't run anything in the .ctors array.
This should help with updating the libobjc2 port for armv7.
Requested by: theraven
Upstream PR: https://github.com/gnustep/libobjc2/issues/83
MFC after: 3 days
[ARM] Don't form "ands" when it isn't scheduled correctly.
In r322972/r323136, the iteration here was changed to catch cases at
the beginning of a basic block... but we accidentally deleted an
important safety check. Restore that check to the way it was.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41116
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59680
This should fix "Assertion failed: (LiveCPSR && "CPSR liveness tracking
is wrong!"), function UpdateCPSRUse" errors when building the devel/xwpe
port for armv7.
PR: 236062, 236568
MFC after: 1 month
X-MFC-With: r344779
[ELF] Support --{,no-}allow-shlib-undefined
Summary:
In ld.bfd/gold, --no-allow-shlib-undefined is the default when
linking an executable. This patch implements a check to error on
undefined symbols in a shared object, if all of its DT_NEEDED entries
are seen.
Our approach resembles the one used in gold, achieves a good balance
to be useful but not too smart (ld.bfd traces all DSOs and emulates
the behavior of a dynamic linker to catch more cases).
The error is issued based on the symbol table, different from
undefined reference errors issued for relocations. It is most
effective when there are DSOs that were not linked with -z defs (e.g.
when static sanitizers runtime is used).
gold has a comment that some system libraries on GNU/Linux may have
spurious undefined references and thus system libraries should be
excluded (https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6811). The
story may have changed now but we make --allow-shlib-undefined the
default for now. Its interaction with -shared can be discussed in the
future.
Reviewers: ruiu, grimar, pcc, espindola
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: joerg, emaste, arichardson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57385
Pull in r352943 from upstream lld trunk (by Fangrui Song):
[ELF] Default to --no-allow-shlib-undefined for executables
Summary:
This follows the ld.bfd/gold behavior.
The error check is useful as it captures a common type of ld.so
undefined symbol errors as link-time errors:
// a.cc => a.so (not linked with -z defs)
void f(); // f is undefined
void g() { f(); }
// b.cc => executable with a DT_NEEDED entry on a.so
void g();
int main() { g(); }
// ld.so errors when g() is executed (lazy binding) or when the program is started (-z now)
// symbol lookup error: ... undefined symbol: f
Reviewers: ruiu, grimar, pcc, espindola
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: llvm-commits, emaste, arichardson
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57569
Together, these add support for --no-allow-shlib-undefined, and make it
the default for executables, so they will fail to link if any symbols
from needed shared libraries are undefined.
Reported by: jbeich
PR: 236062, 236141
MFC after: 1 month
X-MFC-With: r344779
project branch):
Work around LLVM PR30879, which is about a bad interaction between
X86 Call Frame Optimization on i386 and libunwind, by disallowing the
optimization for i386-freebsd12.
This should fix some instances of broken exception handling when
frame pointers are omitted, in particular some unittests run during
the build of editors/libreoffice.
This hack will be removed as soon as upstream has implemented a more
permanent fix for this problem.
And indeed, after r345018 and r345019, which updated LLVM libunwind to
the most recent version, the above workaround is no longer needed. The
upstream commit which fixed this is:
https://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=292723
Specifically, 32 bit (i386-freebsd) executables optimized with omitted
frame pointers and Call Frame Optimization should now behave correctly
when a C++ exception is thrown, and the stack is unwound.
Upstream PR: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=30879
PR: 236062
MFC after: 1 month
X-MFC-With: r344779
Move LLVM's libunwind to its own contrib/ directory similar to other
runtime libraries like libc++ and libcxxrt.
Reviewed by: dim, emaste
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19534
[RegAlloc] Avoid compile time regression with multiple copy hints.
As a fix for https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40986 ("excessive
compile time building opencollada"), this patch makes sure that no
phys reg is hinted more than once from getRegAllocationHints().
This handles the case were many virtual registers are assigned to the
same physreg. The previous compile time fix (r343686) in
weightCalcHelper() only made sure that physical/virtual registers are
passed no more than once to addRegAllocationHint().
Review: Dimitry Andric, Quentin Colombet
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59201
This should fix a hang when compiling certain generated .cpp files in
the graphics/opencollada port.
PR: 236313
MFC after: 1 month
X-MFC-With: r344779
release_80 branch point. Afterwards, we will merge the rest of the
changes in the actual release_80 branch.
PR: 236062
MFC after: 1 month
X-MFC-With: r344779
Fix inline assembler constraint validation
The current constraint logic is both too lax and too strict. It fails
for input outside the [INT_MIN..INT_MAX] range, but it also
implicitly accepts 0 as value when it should not. Adjust logic to
handle both correctly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58649
Pull in r355491 from upstream clang trunk (by Hans Wennborg):
Inline asm constraints: allow ICE-like pointers for the "n"
constraint (PR40890)
Apparently GCC allows this, and there's code relying on it (see bug).
The idea is to allow expression that would have been allowed if they
were cast to int. So I based the code on how such a cast would be
done (the CK_PointerToIntegral case in
IntExprEvaluator::VisitCastExpr()).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58821
These should fix assertions and errors when using the inline assembly
"n" constraint in certain ways.
In case of devel/valgrind, a pointer was used as the input for the
constraint, which lead to "Assertion failed: (isInt() && "Invalid
accessor"), function getInt".
In case of math/secp256k1, a very large integer value was used as input
for the constraint, which lead to "error: value '4624529908474429119'
out of range for constraint 'n'".
PR: 236216, 236194
MFC after: 1 month
X-MFC-With: r344779
not occur with gcc 7 or later). This should prevent the following error
from breaking the head-amd64-gcc CI builds:
In file included from /workspace/src/contrib/llvm/tools/lldb/source/API/SBMemoryRegionInfo.cpp:14:0:
/workspace/src/contrib/llvm/tools/lldb/include/lldb/Target/MemoryRegionInfo.h:128:54: error: 'template<class _InputIterator> lldb_private::MemoryRegionInfos::MemoryRegionInfos(_InputIterator, _InputIterator, const allocator_type&)' inherited from 'std::__1::vector<lldb_private::MemoryRegionInfo>'
using std::vector<lldb_private::MemoryRegionInfo>::vector;
^~~~~~
/workspace/src/contrib/llvm/tools/lldb/include/lldb/Target/MemoryRegionInfo.h:128:54: error: conflicts with version inherited from 'std::__1::vector<lldb_private::MemoryRegionInfo>'
Reported by: CI
[X86] Fix tls variable lowering issue with large code model
Summary:
The problem here is the lowering for tls variable. Below is the DAG
for the code. SelectionDAG has 11 nodes:
t0: ch = EntryToken
t8: i64,ch = load<(load 8 from `i8 addrspace(257)* null`,
addrspace 257)> t0, Constant:i64<0>, undef:i64
t10: i64 = X86ISD::WrapperRIP TargetGlobalTLSAddress:i64<i32*
@x> 0 [TF=10]
t11: i64,ch = load<(load 8 from got)> t0, t10, undef:i64
t12: i64 = add t8, t11
t4: i32,ch = load<(dereferenceable load 4 from @x)> t0, t12,
undef:i64
t6: ch = CopyToReg t0, Register:i32 %0, t4
And when mcmodel is large, below instruction can NOT be folded.
t10: i64 = X86ISD::WrapperRIP TargetGlobalTLSAddress:i64<i32* @x> 0
[TF=10]
t11: i64,ch = load<(load 8 from got)> t0, t10, undef:i64
So "t11: i64,ch = load<(load 8 from got)> t0, t10, undef:i64" is
lowered to " Morphed node: t11: i64,ch = MOV64rm<Mem:(load 8 from
got)> t10, TargetConstant:i8<1>, Register:i64 $noreg,
TargetConstant:i32<0>, Register:i32 $noreg, t0"
When llvm start to lower "t10: i64 = X86ISD::WrapperRIP
TargetGlobalTLSAddress:i64<i32* @x> 0 [TF=10]", it fails.
The patch is to fold the load and X86ISD::WrapperRIP.
Fixes PR26906
Patch by LuoYuanke
Reviewers: craig.topper, rnk, annita.zhang, wxiao3
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58336
This should fix "fatal error: error in backend: Cannot select" messages
when compiling <ctype.h> functions using -mcmodel=large.
Reported by: phk
PR: 233143
MFC after: 3 days
Recommit r353293 "[LLD][ELF] - Set DF_STATIC_TLS flag for i386 target."
With the following changes:
1) Compilation fix:
std::atomic<bool> HasStaticTlsModel = false; ->
std::atomic<bool> HasStaticTlsModel{false};
2) Adjusted the comment in code.
Initial commit message:
DF_STATIC_TLS flag indicates that the shared object or executable
contains code using a static thread-local storage scheme.
Patch checks if IE/LE relocations were used to check if the code uses
a static model. If so it sets the DF_STATIC_TLS flag.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57749
Pull in r353378 from upstream lld trunk (by George Rimar):
[LLD][ELF] - Set DF_STATIC_TLS flag for X64 target
This is the same as D57749, but for x64 target.
"ELF Handling For Thread-Local Storage" p41 says
(https://www.akkadia.org/drepper/tls.pdf):
R_X86_64_GOTTPOFF relocation is used for IE TLS models.
Hence if linker sees this relocation we should add DF_STATIC_TLS flag.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57821
This adds support to lld for the DF_STATIC_TLS flag in shared objects,
which signals to the dynamic linker that the shared object requires
static thread local storage.
See also: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19072
MFC after: 1 week
[MC] Make symbol version errors non-fatal
We stil don't have a source location, which is pretty lame, but at
least we won't tell the user to file a clang bug report anymore.
Fixes PR40712
This will make errors for symbols with @@ versions that are not defined
non-fatal. For example:
void f(void)
{
__asm__(".symver foo,bar@@baz");
}
will now result in:
error: versioned symbol bar@@baz must be defined
instead of clang crashing with a diagnostic report.
PR: 234671
Upstream PR: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40712
MFC after: 3 days
[ARM] Make PerformSHLSimplify add nodes to the DAG worklist correctly.
Intentionally excluding nodes from the DAGCombine worklist is likely
to lead to weird optimizations and infinite loops, so it's generally
a bad idea.
To avoid the infinite loops, fix DAGCombine to use the
isDesirableToCommuteWithShift target hook before performing the
transforms in question, and implement the target hook in the ARM
backend disable the transforms in question.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38530 . (I don't have a
reduced testcase for that bug. But we should have sufficient test
coverage for PerformSHLSimplify given that we're not playing weird
tricks with the worklist. I can try to bugpoint it if necessary,
though.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50667
This should fix a possible hang when compiling sys/dev/nxge/if_nxge.c
(which exists now only in the stable/11 branch) for arm.
[X86] Add FPSW as a Def on some FP instructions that were missing it.
Pull in r352608 from upstream llvm trunk (by Craig Topper):
[X86] Remove a couple places where we unnecessarily pass 0 to the
EmitPriority of some FP instruction aliases. NFC
As far as I can tell we already won't emit these aliases due to an
operand count check in the tablegen code. Removing these because I
couldn't make sense of the inconsistency between fadd and fmul from
reading the code.
I checked the AsmMatcher and AsmWriter files before and after this
change and there were no differences.
Pull in r353015 from upstream llvm trunk (by Craig Topper):
[X86] Print %st(0) as %st when its implicit to the instruction.
Continue printing it as %st(0) when its encoded in the instruction.
This is a step back from the change I made in r352985. This appears
to be more consistent with gcc and objdump behavior.
Pull in r353061 from upstream llvm trunk (by Craig Topper):
[X86] Print all register forms of x87 fadd/fsub/fdiv/fmul as having
two arguments where on is %st.
All of these instructions consume one encoded register and the other
register is %st. They either write the result to %st or the encoded
register. Previously we printed both arguments when the encoded
register was written. And we printed one argument when the result was
written to %st. For the stack popping forms the encoded register is
always the destination and we didn't print both operands. This was
inconsistent with gcc and objdump and just makes the output assembly
code harder to read.
This patch changes things to always print both operands making us
consistent with gcc and objdump. The parser should still be able to
handle the single register forms just as it did before. This also
matches the GNU assembler behavior.
Pull in r353141 from upstream llvm trunk (by Craig Topper):
[X86] Connect the default fpsr and dirflag clobbers in inline
assembly to the registers we have defined for them.
Summary:
We don't currently map these constraints to physical register numbers
so they don't make it to the MachineIR representation of inline
assembly.
This could have problems for proper dependency tracking in the
machine schedulers though I don't have a test case that shows that.
Reviewers: rnk
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: eraman, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57641
Pull in r353489 from upstream llvm trunk (by Craig Topper):
[X86] Add FPCW as a register and start using it as an implicit use on
floating point instructions.
Summary:
FPCW contains the rounding mode control which we manipulate to
implement fp to integer conversion by changing the roudning mode,
storing the value to the stack, and then changing the rounding mode
back. Because we didn't model FPCW and its dependency chain, other
instructions could be scheduled into the middle of the sequence.
This patch introduces the register and adds it as an implciit def of
FLDCW and implicit use of the FP binary arithmetic instructions and
store instructions. There are more instructions that need to be
updated, but this is a good start. I believe this fixes at least the
reduced test case from PR40529.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, rnk, efriedma, andrew.w.kaylor
Subscribers: dim, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57735
These should fix a problem in clang 7.0 where it would sometimes emit
long double floating point instructions in a slightly wrong order,
leading to failures in our libm tests. In particular, the cbrt_test
test case 'cbrtl_powl' and the trig_test test case 'reduction'.
Reported by: lwhsu
PR: 234040
Upstream PR: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40206
[X86] Add FPSW as a Def on some FP instructions that were missing it.
Pull in r353141 from upstream llvm trunk (by Craig Topper):
[X86] Connect the default fpsr and dirflag clobbers in inline
assembly to the registers we have defined for them.
Summary:
We don't currently map these constraints to physical register numbers
so they don't make it to the MachineIR representation of inline
assembly.
This could have problems for proper dependency tracking in the
machine schedulers though I don't have a test case that shows that.
Reviewers: rnk
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: eraman, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57641
Pull in r353489 from upstream llvm trunk (by Craig Topper):
[X86] Add FPCW as a register and start using it as an implicit use on
floating point instructions.
Summary:
FPCW contains the rounding mode control which we manipulate to
implement fp to integer conversion by changing the roudning mode,
storing the value to the stack, and then changing the rounding mode
back. Because we didn't model FPCW and its dependency chain, other
instructions could be scheduled into the middle of the sequence.
This patch introduces the register and adds it as an implciit def of
FLDCW and implicit use of the FP binary arithmetic instructions and
store instructions. There are more instructions that need to be
updated, but this is a good start. I believe this fixes at least the
reduced test case from PR40529.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, rnk, efriedma, andrew.w.kaylor
Subscribers: dim, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57735
These should fix a problem in clang 7.0 where it would sometimes emit
long double floating point instructions in a slightly wrong order,
leading to failures in our libm tests. In particular, the cbrt_test
test case 'cbrtl_powl' and the trig_test test case 'reduction'.
Also bump __FreeBSD_cc_version, to be able to detect this in our test
suite.
Reported by: lwhsu
PR: 234040
Upstream PR: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40206
MFC after: 1 week
Refactoring. NFC.
Pull in r352435 from upstream lld trunk (by Rui Ueyama):
Attempt to fix build failure with GCC 5.4.
Pull in r352482 from upstream lld trunk (by George Rimar):
[ELF] - Remove dead `readBfdName` declaration. NFC.
`readBfdName` was removed recently.
Pull in r352606 from upstream lld trunk (by me):
Recognize FreeBSD specific BFD names in OUTPUT_FORMAT
Summary:
After rLLD344952 ("Add OUTPUT_FORMAT linker script directive
support"), using BFD names such as `elf64-x86-64-freebsd` the
`OUTPUT_FORMAT` linker script command does not work anymore,
resulting in errors like:
```
ld: error: /home/dim/src/clang800-import/stand/efi/loader/arch/amd64/ldscript.amd64:2: unknown output format name: elf64-x86-64-freebsd
>>> OUTPUT_FORMAT("elf64-x86-64-freebsd", "elf64-x86-64-freebsd", "elf64-x86-64-freebsd")
>>> ^
```
To fix this, recognize a `-freebsd` suffix in BFD names, and also set
`Configuration::OSABI` to `ELFOSABI_FREEBSD` for those cases.
Add and/or update several test cases to check for the correct results
of these new `OUTPUT_FORMAT` arguments.
Reviewers: ruiu, atanasyan, grimar, hokein, emaste, espindola
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: nemanjai, javed.absar, arichardson, krytarowski, kristof.beyls, kbarton, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57283
FreeBSD previously defaulted to DWARF 2 because several tools (gdb,
ctfconvert, etc.) did not support later versions. These have either
been fixed or are deprecated.
Note that gdb 6 still exists but has been moved out of $PATH into
/usr/libexec and is intended only for use by crashinfo(8). The kernel
build sets the DWARF version explicitly via -gdwarf2, so this should
have no effect there.
PR: 234887 [exp-run]
Reviewed by: markj
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17930
